Feb. 2, 2023
Organization of scientific events
► Full reference: M.-A. Frison-Roche, co-organisation de la formation ENM Droit de la Compliance, co-organisé entre l'École nationale de la magistrature et le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC), les 2 et 3 février 2023.
____
► General presentation of the course: The two-day session is designed for magistrates and practicing lawyers who are not necessarily specialized, to enable them, based on concrete cases, to understand the issues, objectives, and methods of compliance mechanisms in companies, including the increasing judicialization and the supranational dimension strengthen, modifying the office of the judge and the role of lawyers.
The analysis is made from the angle of Civil Law (contract, tort), Company Law, Labor Law and Criminal Law, but also governance, financial markets, regulatory, climate and digital issues.
____
► Brief bibliography:
____
► Will speak:
🎤François Ancel, Judge at the Première chambre civile de la Cour de cassation ( First civil chamber of the Court of Cassation)
🎤Guillaume Beaussonie, Professor at Toulouse 1 Capitole University
🎤Jean-François Bohnert, Procureur national financier
🎤Gilles Briatta, Group General Secretary of the Groupe Société Générale
🎤Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, Director of the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC)
🎤Cécile Granier, senior lecturer at Jean-Moulin Lyon 3 University
🎤Jean-Michel Hayat, Premier Président honoraire de la Cour d'appel de Paris
🎤Christophe Ingrain, Avocat à la Cour
🎤Anne-Valérie Le Fur, Professor at Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
🎤Stanislas Pottier, Senior Advisor to the General Management of Amundi
🎤Jean-Baptiste Racine, Professeur à l'Université Panthéon-Assas (Paris II)
🎤Juliette Thery, Membre du Collège de l'Arcom
____
Lire une présentation détaillée de la manifestation ci-dessous⤵️
Jan. 19, 2022
Organization of scientific events
► Full Reference: Frison-Roche, M.-A., coordination and moderation of the conference L'office du juge et les causes systémiques (""The Office of the Judge and systemic causes"), in Cycle of Conferences, Penser l'office du juge ("Thinking the Office of the Judge"), Grand Chamber of the Cour de cassation, Paris, May 9, 2021, 17h-19h.
The conference is held in French.
____
► General presentation of the conference: the conference is based on the intervention of three judges, Christophe Soulard, Fabien Raynaud, and François Ancel, who think and debate among themselves on a hypothesis: the existence of "systemic causes". The hypothesis is that beyond and through the diversity of disputes and cases that are submitted to the most diverse judges, there is a category of cases that are systemic, which means containing in what is submitted to the judge for resolution a system. If such a category exists, which also raises the question of the diversity of systems and the difficulty arising from their submission to rules that are not legal (for example economic, biological, financial "laws", etc.) , then the judge should take this into account, both in the procedure and in the judgment they make on the case and in the way they formulate et restitute this judgment.
____
📝read the presentation of this conference by the Cour de cassation (in French)
📝read the program of the cycle of conferences 2022 (in French)
____
🎥see the conference video (in French)
🎥 see the synthesis video of the conference, made in situ by Marie-Anne Frison-Roche (in French)
____
✏️read the notes taken during the conference to make the synthesis (in French)
📝read the article of Marie-Anne Frison-Roche restituting this conference, published in the Recueil Dalloz (in French)
____
►read the works, basis of the two interventions of Marie-Anne Frison-Roche
🚧 L'hypothèse de la "cause systémique (made before the conference to prepare it), available en English
📝Synthese of the conference (made during the conference)
________
Sept. 15, 2021
Organization of scientific events
► co-organized between Laboratoire DANTE and the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC), this colloquium) is the core manifestation of the 2021 series of colloquia devoted to the general theme of Compliance Monumental Goals.
It will take place on 16th of September 2021, at the Maison du Barreau, in Paris.
This first work is in French but will be the basis of the book in English : Compliance Monumental Goals,
This book will be published in the Compliance & Regulation Series, co-published by the JoRC and Bruylant.
► Presentation of the colloquium Thematic: To understand the notion of "Monumental Goals", it is firstly necessary to take crossed perspectives on them, particularly through the prism of Labor Law, Environmental Law and Enterprise Law. Many questions appear. Does the notion of “Monumental Goals” present any substance in Law? Is it uniformly understood, or do specificities appear, forged by specific cultures and disciplinary practices? What are the sources and implicit references or echoes? Because even if we admit the part of novelty, there is undoubtedly an anchoring in traditional legal concepts, like the general interest or sovereignty. How does the shift from meta-legal (prima facie introduced by the concept) to legal take place, and where do any operational difficulties lie when legal actors are called upon to act? The question of a possible categorization of "Monumental Goals" will thus be explored, through these three legal disciplines whose historicity, goals and implications for firms differ.
These reflections allow to ask why and how these "Monumental Goals" are developed. Indeed, what is the relevance of the association of "Monumental Goals" and Compliance? Beyond theoretical considerations relating to the meaning of Law, is this really an effective alloy encouraging companies to behave differently? By what ways? These questions arise in particular with regard to the imperatives of legal certainty and the operative nature of the concept. The question of "Monumental Goals" will thus be explored by the operational actors of compliance, both those who act within companies and those who act from the lato sensu State sphere, for understanding whether this notion is a pure rhetoric figure or constitutes a particularly promising lever for the evolution of market behavior.
► with :
🎤 Christophe André, maître de conférences à l'Université Paris - Saclay (lecturer at the Paris-Saclay University)
🎤 Guillaume Beaussonie, professeur à l'Université Toulouse-1-Capitole (law professor at Toulouse-1-Capitole University)
🎤 Regis Bismuth, professeur de droit à Sciences po, Paris (law professor at Sciences po Paris)
🎤 Marie-Emma Boursier, doyen de l'Université Paris - Saclay (dean of the Paris-Saclay University)
🎤 Muriel Chagny, professeur l'Université Paris - Saclay, directrice du Laboratoire Dante (Professor at the Paris-Saclay University, director of the Laboratory Dante)
🎤 Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, professeur à Sciences po (Paris) (Professor at Sciences Po Paris)
🎤 Isabelle Gavanon, avocate à la Cour d'Appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)
🎤 Emma Guernaoui, ATER à l'Université Paris II Panthéon-Assas (ATER at Paris II Panthéon-Assas University)
🎤 Dominique Heintz, avocat à la Cour d' appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)
🎤 Christian Huglo, avocat à la Cour d' appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)
🎤Dominique de La Garanderie, avocat à la Cour d'appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)
🎤 Anne-Valérie Le Fur, professeur à l'Université Paris - Saclay (Professor at Paris-Saclay University)
🎤 Anne Le Goff, secrétaire générale déléguée d'Arkéa (Deputy Secretary general at Arkéa)
🎤 Roch-Olivier Maistre, président du Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (President of the French audiovisual regulation authority)
🎤 Marie Malaurie, professeur à l'Université Paris-Saclay (professor at the Paris-Saclay University)
🎤 Jérôme Marilly, avocat général à la Cour d'Appel de Paris (General attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)
🎤 Benoît Petit, maître de conférences (HDR) à l'Université Paris-Saclay (lecturer at the Paris-Saclay University)
🎤 Jean-François Vaquieri, Secrétaire Général d'Enedis (Secretary General of Enedis)
____
Read a detailed presentation below:
June 23, 2021
Organization of scientific events
This scientific manifestation is placed under the scientific responsibility of Marie-Anne Frison-Roche and Jean-Christophe Roda. It is organized by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and the Centre de Droit de l'Entreprise of Lyon 3 University.
It is the fourth colloquium of the cycle of colloquia organized in 2021 around the general topic of Juridictionnalization of Compliance.
The different interventions will be then transformed into contributions in the books La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance and Compliance Juridictionnalization which will be published in the Regulation & Compliance serie, jointly published by the JoRC and Dalloz for the book in French and by JoRC and Bruylant for the book in English.
This colloquium will take place in Lyon 3 on 23rd of June 2021 with a limited audience. It will also be broadcasted in live on Zoom.
To register: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/8516215084724/WN_GoQ25I7pRoKhHuGomVMxYw
Presentation of the topic: Initially, it was through Criminal Law, inseparable from the trial, which forced companies to take charge of monitoring within themselves behavior likely to be deviant, the requirement of Ex Ante to be designed by the 'Ex Post of the jurisdictional. From this reversal of things, there has always remained this presence of the judge and the prosecution bodies in a Compliance Law which is nevertheless defined by its concern for the future and the Ex Ante tools within the company.
In doing so, the company becoming on the one hand a judge of itself, on the other hand a prosecutor of itself, it splits up, taking in reverse the most established procedural principles. Moreover, because of the monumental goals which constitute Compliance Law, companies become attorneys and judges of the others, or for the others, the cutting machines and the "supreme courts" being by name instituted to regulate in Ex Ante all different before that it does not become litigation. The Ex Ante of Compliance would then make the Ex Post disappear.
Method:
The colloquium which had to take place initially on 8th of April has been postponed to 23rd of June to enable speakers to meet and talk in face to face, with a limited audience.
These exchanges will be captured so that third parties can benefit from them, even before the publication of the works, La Juridictionnalisation de la Compliance and Compliance Juridictionalization, within which this work constitutes the basis for the development of a specific chapter.
Five practical cases will first be examined in five specific sectors, where this institution of the firm as prosecutor and judge of itself is particularly observable before both specific and more cross-sectoral themes are examined and discussed.
Will speak :
🎤Luc-Marie Augagneur, attorney before Lyon Court of Appeal, CVS Law Firm
🎤Alexis Bavitot, senior lecturer at Lyon 3 University
🎤Alain Bruneau, chief compliance officer at Natixis
🎤Jean-Marc Coulon, Head of Legal Infrastructure at Bouygues Construction
🎤Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, director of the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC)
🎤Cécile Granier, senior lecturer at Lyon 3 University
🎤Xavier Hubert, director of Compliance at Engie
🎤Jérémie Jourdan-Marques, professor at Lyon 2 University
🎤Jérémy Heymann, professor at Lyon 3 University
🎤Daphnée Latour, attorney before Paris Court of Appeal
🎤Christophe Lapp, founding partner of Altana law firm
🎤Samir Merabet, senior lecturer at Lyon 3 University
🎤Béatrice Oeuvrard, Public Policy Manager at Facebook France
🎤Jean du Parc, Bâtonnier
🎤Jean-Christophe Roda, professor at Lyon 3 University and director of the Centre de droit de l'entreprise (Center of Company Law)
🎤Jean-Baptiste Siproudhis, director Ethics, Integrity and CSR at Thalès
May 17, 2021
Organization of scientific events
This scientific manifestation is placed under the scientific direction of Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, Pascale Idoux, Antoine Oumedjkane and Adrien Tehrani. It is organized by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and by the Faculté de Droit et de Science Politique de l'Université de Montpellier (Centre de Recherches et d'Etudes Administratives de Montpellier and Centre du Droit de l'Entreprise).
This manifestation is part of the cycle of colloquia organized in 2021 around the general topic of Compliance Monumental Goals.
The interventions will give rise to the production of articles which will be part of the books Les bus monumentaux de la Compliance and Compliance Monumental Goals which will be published in the Series Regulations & Compliance, coedited by the JoRC and Dalloz for the French version and by the JoRC and Bruylant for the English version.
This manifestation will take place on Zoom on 17th of May 2021.
Registrations: anouk.leguillou@mafr.fr
Assistance to this event may be validated as part of the continuing education of lawyers.
In addition, scientific videos will be extracted and disseminated later.
Presentation of the topic: In the overall problematic of "Monumental goals", this conference retains a particular case: that of the crisis and the emergency situation that it generates.
First of all, in general, does the importance of public norms in the emergency context engendered by a crisis situation imply a marginalization of Compliance? Don't private actors also have their place in these circumstances, at the service of the "monumental goals" that the public authorities want to maintain, or even which appear specifically?
Secondly, more concretely, we have been living for many months in a health crisis. By taking it as a framework and, within it from particular cases, how public and private actors react, act, adjust? and how do the courts assess these movements?
Going from the most general to the most specific, this conference aims to identify criteria, limits, of what could be specific rules when the emergency of a crisis meets Compliance, and will examine specific situations.
Working method: The conference is therefore built on a general issue, which was the subject of a "working paper", written by Antoine Oumedjkane, Adrien Tehrani and Pascale Idoux, on which the speakers will have thought in advance and from which they are intended to study the question from their particular perspective.
The conference, which is essentially interactive, therefore begins with an outline of the main lines of this general work. It is followed by the examination of concrete practical cases.
They are as follows:
1️⃣ hydroalcoholic gel, its manufacture, price, availability,
2️⃣ information and regulation on all media in Covid period
3️⃣ the use of the bicycle during the state of health emergency
A first conclusion, thematically limited, will relate to Revealed by the crisis situation, the place of private initiative in Compliance Law.
A second, more general, undoubtedly open-ended conclusion is drawn from this confrontation between general reflection and concrete cases which must be resolved in a particular crisis.
Will speak:
⤵️Read a more detailed presentation of the manifestation below:
March 31, 2021
Organization of scientific events
This scientific event is placed under the scientific responsibility of Marie-Anne Frison-Roche and Jean-Baptiste Racine. It is organized by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and by the Centre de recherche sur la Justice et le Règlement des Conflits (CRJ) of the Panthéon-Assas (Paris II) University, with the active support of the International Chamber of Commerce ICC.
This event is the third colloquium of the 2021 colloquia cycle around the general theme of Compliance Juridictionnalization.
The different interventions will be then transformed into contributions in the books La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance and Compliance Juridictionnalization which will be published in the Regulation & Compliance serie, jointly published by the JoRC and Dalloz for the book in French and by JoRC and Bruylant for the book in English.
This colloquium will take place the 31st of March 2021.
The manifestation will be live broadcasted on Zoom.
To register: https://u-paris2-fr.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_sPSB4aUUQTWDWDnNcYt3sA
Presentation of the theme:
The arbitrator is the ordinary judge of international trade. It was natural that he or she encountered Compliance: by definition Compliance Law takes hold of the whole world and follows the paths of international trade while it can only be deployed with the help of institutions which, by nature are spreading around the world and need authorities like the Courts.
The conference is based on the already perceptible connection points between Compliance and Arbitration to better identify what is emerging for tomorrow: contradiction or convergence between the two; weakening or consolidation. We are already seeing the impact that Compliance can have on the arbitrator's treatment of corruption or the consideration of money laundering. More generally, where do we stand with the arbitrator's knowledge of the many technical issues related to compliance? Beyond these, will the courts and arbitrators be able to achieve the goals, themselves new, sometimes monumental, pursued by Compliance Law?
Through this joint exploration of these avenues, the fate of compliance clauses inserted in contracts, the relevance in the matter of private codes of conduct, etc. will be examined.
Tomorrow, as of today, is the arbitrator a full and complete judge of Compliance Law?
How, with what specificities and what controls?
Notably will speak:
Read a detailed presentation of the colloquium below:
June 18, 2020
Organization of scientific events
Like the precedent cycles dedicated to the general topic of Compliance, aiming to build a "Compliance Law" and aiming also to be published in the series Regulation & Compliance, coedited by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance and Dalloz, this cycle continues to deepen a specific aspect of this emerging branch of Law which has been applied before being designed.
The year 2020-2021 will give rise to two full and distinct cycles, the former deepening a key concept of Compliance Law, that are "monumental goals" and the later deepening a phenomenon with multiple roots and consequences: "the juridictionnalization of Compliance".
The juridictionnalization of Compliance is perhaps as ancient as Compliance mechanisms themselves.
These various conferences will take place in different places, according to the role played by the very numerous universities which, this year once again, support the Journal of Regulation & Compliance for the realization of this cycle. This cycle will give rise to two books, one in French: La Juridictionnalisation de la Compliance, and the other in English : Juridictionnalization of Compliance.
This cycle of colloquia The juridictionnalization of Compliance will start in October 2020 and will take place until December 2021.
June 18, 2020
Organization of scientific events
Like the precedent cycles dedicated to the general topic of Compliance, aiming to build a "Compliance Law" and aiming also to be published in the series Regulation & Compliance, coedited by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance and Dalloz, this cycle continues to deepen a specific aspect of this emerging branch of Law which has been applied before being designed.
The year 2020-2021 will give rise to two full and distinct cycles, the former deepening a key concept of Compliance Law, that are "monumental goals" and the later deepening a phenomenon with multiple roots and consequences: "the juridictionnalization of Compliance".
Compliance Monumental Goals has been proposed in 2016.
These various conferences will take place in different places, according to the role played by the very numerous universities which, this year once again, support the Journal of Regulation & Compliance for the realization of this cycle. This cycle will give rise to two books, one in French: Les Buts Monumentaux de la Compliance, and the other in English : Compliance Monumental Goals.
This cycle of colloquia Compliance Monumental Goals will start in October 2020 and will take place until December 2021.
Feb. 4, 2020
Organization of scientific events
The cycle of conferences Les outils de la Compliance (The Compliance tools) began in November 2019 and runs until June 2020. It is organized by The Journal of Regulation & Compliance and all of its partner universities. It includes a conference more particularly devoted to the theme of "La prégnance géographique dans le choix et l'usage des outils de la Compliance" ("Geographic significance in the choice and use of Compliance tools").
Conference and Debate (in French)
Thuesday, February 4, 2020, 16h30– 19h30
Law & Political Sciences School
Doyen Louis Trotabas Avenue, 06050 Nice Cedex.
Amphithéâtre Bonnecarrère, Villa Passiflore,
General Presentation:
Compliance is a global phenomenon. In this, it illustrates the problematic of a Global Law. However, it should not be inferred that Compliance is applied in the same way everywhere in the world. Like any legal institution, it is integrated into a preexisting legal framework, shaped by culture and history.
The aim of the conference is to explore geographic significance in Compliance Tools, that is to say the potentially different way in which these tools are chosen and used depending on the geographic area concerned. The three geographic areas studied will mainly be Europe, the United States and Africa. Opportunity will thus be given to highlight the convergences and divergences in the implementation of Compliance Tools in a geographic vision of the institution.
Under the scientific direction of Jean-Baptiste Racine, professor at the University Côté d'Azur (Law & Political Sciences School of Nice), GREDEG-CREDECO, CNRS UMR 7321
With the interventions of:
- Jean-Baptiste Racine, professor at the University Côté d'Azur , Nice
- Mahmoud Mohammed Salah, Law professor at the University of Nouakchott, Mauritany
- Karen Coppens, Dechert LLP
- Mads Andenas, Law professor at the University of Oslo, Norway
- Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, Law professor at Sciences Po, Paris
____
_________
Read the registration procedure for this conference.
Consult the gele calendar of upcoming events.
Consult the presentation of the book to be published "Compliance Tools".
Go back to general presentation of the Conferences' cycle "Compliance Tools".
Inscription : anouk.leguillou@mafr.fr
_________
Jan. 29, 2020
Organization of scientific events
The cycle of conferences Les outils de la Compliance (The Compliance tools) began in November 2019 and runs until June 2020. It is organized by The Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and all of its partner universities. It includes a conference more particularly devoted to the theme of "Les expertises requises dans l'Ex Ante de la Compliance" ("The expertises required in the Ex Ante of Compliance").
Conference – Debate
Wednesday, January 29, 2020, 18h30-20h
in the amphitheater of the Paris Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Friedland Avenue, 27, 75008 Paris
General Presentation
After examining various specific tools, such as Risk mapping or Incentives, these showing that the tools only have their efficiency through their use designed and carried out by human beings, endowed themselves with the required expertise. But it is often because it is very difficult to identify and define these "skills" that operators subject to the Ex Ante Compliance obligations end up entrusting this observance to machines, via Compliance by Design ...
The mass of what should actually be observed leads to favoring massification expertise, as the "Regtech" handle it. But the rules being a living thing, Company Law adjoins Governance and one must know both. In the same way as the mastery of Ex Ante supposes that one always thinks of Ex Post (sanction for failure in the Ex Ante), so that this Ex Post does not appear, under its unwelcome face of Repressive Law which therefore must be anticipated and therefore present in Ex Ante.
In the same way, Tax Compliance presupposes that the State must be present in the good technical conception of Compliance. Compliance being the means by which States internalize their "monumental goals", or even confront each other under the mask of companies, it is then international policies in question, and this political expertise is required in Ex Ante.
_________
under the scientific direction of Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, professor fo Regulatory Law Compliance Law at Sciences Po.
with :
- - Antoinette Gutierrez-Crespin, partner, department Forensic & Integrity Services EY France.
- François Barrière and Sidne Koenigsberg, Skadden
- Pierre Vimont, Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
- Benjamin Jean, president of Open Law
- Thomas Amico, Linklaters
________________
Read the registration procedure for this conference.
Consult the general calendar of upcoming events.
Consult the presentation of the book to be published "Compliance Tools".
Go back to general presentation of the Conferences' cycle "Compliance Tools".
Inscription : anouk.leguillou@mafr.fr
Dec. 12, 2019
Organization of scientific events
Le cycle de conférences Les outils de la Compliance se déroulant entre novembre 2019 et juin 2020 coordonné par The Journal of Regulation & Compliance et toutes les Universités partenaires comprend une conférence plus particulièrement consacrée au thème suivant "Les incitations, Outils de la Compliance ".
Conférence – Débat
jeudi 12 décembre 2019, 15h– 19h30
Université Toulouse Capitole
2 rue du Doyen Gabriel Marty 31042 Toulouse cedex 9
Sous la direction scientifique de Lucien Rapp, Professeur à l’Université Toulouse Capitole, Directeur scientifique de la Chaire SIRIUS, Directeur de l’IDETCOM.
La technique de l’incitation prend une importance grandissante comme outil des politiques et stratégies de conformité (compliance). Elle s’inscrit logiquement dans le mouvement récent d’assouplissement de la légalité (soft Law) et utilise les ressorts profonds de la psychologie humaine. Elle constitue déjà un complément - sinon un substitut - de la méthode traditionnelle dite du Command and Control, qui repose sur des normes impératives et sur leur sanction, le plus souvent pénale. Elle en compense les insuffisances (inefficacité de la sanction) et en corrige les excès (externalités négatives : coûts d’agence, passager clandestin, confiscation de l’information, utilité collective). Nouvelle forme de régulation du marché, cette Compliance par incitation associe davantage les opérateurs à l’élaboration de la règle comme à son respect et s’adresse à leur sens des responsabilités (Comply or Explain, RSE, notamment).
Ont pris notamment la parole :
_________
Ce cycle de manifestations est organisé par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) (consulter les partenaires scientifiques du cycle), dont le thème général est Les outils de la Compliance.
Se reporter aux modalités d'inscription pour les conférences. Si une conférence est organisée par une Université particulière, elle peut faire l'objet de modalités particulières. Se reporter alors à celles-ci.
Consulter le calendrier des manifestations.
Revenir à la présentation générale du Cycle de conférences.
La participation à chaque séance est validée au titre de la formation continue des avocats (2h).
Cette conférence sert également d'appui à la réalisation d'un ouvrage plus global portant d'une façon générale sur Les outils de la Compliance, dans lequel les conférenciers ont vocation à contribuer par un article. L'ouvrage Compliance Tools sera publié en même temps.
Nov. 28, 2019
Organization of scientific events
The conferences cycle Les outils de la Compliance (The Compliance tools) taking place between November 2019 and June 2020 organized by The Journal of Regulation & Compliance and all the Partner Universities will start this year on the theme of "La cartographie des risques" (Risk Mapping) .
_________
Conference - Debate (in French)
jeudi Thursday, November 28, 2019. 19h15 – 21h15
at the Economics Department of Sciences Po
28 rue des Saints-Pères 75007 Paris
Amphithéâtre Simone Veil
Under the scientific coordination of Guillaume Sarrat de Tramezaigues, Executive Director fo the Economics Department of Sciences po.
Risk Mapping is defined as a process of identifying, evaluating and prioritizing risks: it is an integral and fundamental part of an effective global strategy for managing these risks.
As a central tool for Compliance, this approach may not be radically new, but the Risk Mapping Technique is now renewed and sometimes compromised by the emergence of new Risks, often due to their new mutiform nature. Moreover, the primacy of the new pair of "Political Risks/Compliance Risks" tends to increase the vulnerability of organizations obliged by new legal provisions to draw up these maps, whereas these tools must also protect these organizations.
Before discussing it with the audience, the speakers will explain through their experience the place of this tool in Compliance, by looking at how Risk Mapping is articulated with the logic of value creation through risk-taking, inherent in entrepreneurial and political action. This good understanding is not only essential for the company, but also for the administrative and judicial authorities which control or sanction firms.
Especially with the interventions of:
- Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, full professor of Regulatory Law and Compliance Law, Sciences Po
- Jean-François Guillemin, former general secretary of the Bouygues Group
- Lamia Liabes, Chief Operating Office, HSBC France
- Guillaume Sarrat de Tramezaigues, executive Director fo the Economics Department of Sciences po
Inscription : anouk.leguillou@mafr.fr
_________
This first event is more specifically organized by the Economics Department of Sciences po.
It opens the cycle of conferences organized by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) (see the partners of this cycle), whose general theme is Les outils de la Compliance (The Compliance tools).
Read the General Presentation of the Conferences Cycles.
This manifestation will be the basis for a book.
Read the conditions for inscription, and conditions for access les conditions d'accès (in French).
_________
June 18, 2019
Organization of scientific events
As the previous cycles devoted to the general theme of Compliance and aiming to build a "Compliance Law", having the same vocation to be published in the series Regulation & Compliance, co-published by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and the Editions Dalloz, this cycle takes a particular aspect of this branch of the Law being built and developed, which was applied even before being conceived. Since pragmatism preceded or even prevailed, the theme chosen this year is: Les outils de la Compliance (Compliance Tools).
These conferences will be in French
These tools are very diverse, not only among themselves but according to the sectors in which they are deployed or according to the geographical areas in which they are applied. It is necessary to apprehend them by going beyond the description of the instrument literally shown, as the texts or the promoters show it, without immediately going up to too large generalities. For this reason, some conferences will focus on specific, well-identified mechanisms, such as risk mapping or alert. They may also consider how Compliance Law uses more general tools to achieve its goals, such as lawsuits, incentives or new technologies. This will make it possible to problematize more clearly perceptible difficulties in Compliance Law, such as the adequacy or inadequacy of the constraint in relation to the aims, the consideration or not of the legal and political geography, the articulation or not of the tools between them.
These various conferences will take place in several places, according to the part taken by the different university structures that this year contribute to the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) for the realization of the cycle. The result will be two books, one in French: Les outils de la Compliance, the other in English: Compliance Tools.
This cycle of conferences about Compliance tools will begin in November 2019 and will last until June 2020.
Le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) works with :
This cycle of conferences is supported by :
March 6, 2018
Organization of scientific events
Co-organisation scientifique du colloque de la Cour de cassation, avec l'appui de l'Association Française de Philosophie du Droit, Droit & Éthique, 31 mai 2018.
Il est classique d'affirmer que le Droit et l'Éthique sont liés, voire sont intimes. Mais beaucoup en doutent, voire estiment que le Droit ne serait qu'une technique, appréciée à l'aune de son "efficacité", le "bon juriste" étant le technicien apte à apporter de la sécurité aux projets bâtis hors de lui. Le déclin de l'État, l'élan technologique fait rayonner une telle conception, qui se traduit notamment dans la façon dont le Droit est enseigné, est élaboré, est appliqué.
Mais si justement parce que les lieux d'expression et de garde des valeurs sont en quelque sorte "compromis" le Droit et l'Éthique étaient plus que jamais liés ?
Avec notamment la participation de :
March 1, 2018
Organization of scientific events
Organisation scientifique et organisation du cycle de conférences "Pour une Europe de la Compliance"
Le cycle de conférences Pour une Europe de la compliance débutant le 2 mars 2018 est organisé par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC), en collaboration avec l’École d'affaires publiques de l’École d’Affaires Publiques de Sciences po (Paris), le Département d’Économie de Sciences po,,École de Droit de l'Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris I), l’École doctorale de Droit privé de l'Université Panthéon-Assas (Paris II) et les Éditions Dalloz.
__________
Consulter la présentation générale du cycle
Consulter la liste des conférenciers.
Consulter les informations relatives aux conférences :
Consulter la manifestation publique du 2 mars 2018.
Consulter la manifestation publique du 12 avril 2018.
Consulter la manifestation publique du 30 mai 2018.
Consulter la manifestation publique du 7 juin 2018.
Consulter la manifestation publique du 6 septembre 2018.
Consulter la manifestation publique du 4 octobre 2018.
Consulter la manifestation publique du 15 novembre 2018.
Consulter la manifestation publique du 13 décembre 2018.
Aug. 2, 2016
Organization of scientific events
Lire la problématique sur laquelle le cycle de conférences a été construite.
Le cycle de conférences est organisé par le Journal of Regulation (JoR), en collaboration avec l’École d'affaires publiques de Sciences Po et le Département d’Économie de Sciences Po.
April 16, 2015
Organization of scientific events
Il s'agit d'une conférence-débat de Madame Christiane Taubira, Ministre de la Justice, garde des Sceaux
Lire le compte-rendu fait par le Ministère de la justice.
Lire l'article de Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, faisant suite : Les lignes de force de la réforme du droit français des contrats.
Cette conférence-débat a eu lieu à Sciences po (Paris), le 16 avril 2015, de 17h à 19h.
Son thème porte sur La réforme du droit des contrats.
La participation était sur invitation.
17h00 : Accueil et mot de bienvenue par Frédéric Mion, directeur de Sciences Po
17h05 : Présentation de la réforme du droit des contrats par Christiane Taubira, ministre de la justice, Garde des Sceaux
17h25 : Débat entre Christiane Taubira et deux dirigeants d’entreprise
- Rémi Cléro, Président Directeur Général d'Amore Pacific Europe
- Jean-Marc Janaillac, Président Directeur Général de Transdev
18h00 : Débat entre Christiane Taubira et les étudiants
Modération des débats par Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, professeur de droit à Sciences po.
Dec. 3, 2014
Organization of scientific events
3 décembre 2014, 15 h - 20 h
27 rue Saint-Guillaume, Amphi Chapsal
Sous la direction scientifique de Marie-Anne Frison-Roche et Marie-Jo Bonnet
Lire la problématique du colloque
Inscription pour une personne ayant un courriel et un identifiant la rattachant à Sciences Po
Oct. 15, 2013
Organization of scientific events
Ce colloque a été organisé par The Journal of Regulation et KPMG.
Il s’appuie tout à la fois sur le constat du développement technique et commercial du stockage et de la manipulation d’un nombre astronomique de données d’une part et du travail que l’Europe depuis des mois consacre à l’adoption toujours reportée d’un règlement européen relatif aux "données personnelles".
Après l’analyse prospective par Madame le Président Isabelle Falque-Pierrotin de la problématique et celle comparée entre l’Europe et les Etats-Unis par Maître Winston Maxwell, s'est déroulé une table ronde, composée majoritairement d’entrepreneurs maniant ces stocks de données sensibles, qui sont aussi bien des valeurs que des dangers, deux faces de la même médaille.
Oct. 3, 2013
Organization of scientific events
La Conférence Générale des Bâtonniers a consacré l’année 2013 à élaborer un travail collectif sur l’organisation ordinale de la profession d’avocat, son état actuel et son avenir. 4 commissions ont plus particulièrement travaillé sur les questions de la dématérialisation, de l’Europe, de la valorisation de la prestation de l’avocat et les rapports entre l’avocat et l’entreprise. Ces thèmes ont été choisis par la Conférence en ce qu’ils sont les plus actuels, les plus problématiques et ce sur quoi il faut que les structures ordinales décident pour l’avenir.
Les rapports ont été soumis à l’ensemble des Conseils des Ordres via le site de la Conférence avant la tenue des États Généraux, durant lesquels ils seront présentés et débattus.Cette journée d'États Généraux est le résultat de tout ce travail.
Il s'est agi ici de "modérer" les échanges et les débats de l’ensemble de la journée, avant que le président de la Conférence Jean-Luc Forget n’en fasse la synthèse.
Lire la présentation générale de la manifestation, telle qu'elle a été publiée par la suite dans la presse.
Se reporter à l'intervention de synthèse faite par Marie-Anne Frison-Roche.
L'ensemble de ce travail a abouti à un ouvrage : Frison-Roche, M.-A. et Forget, J.-L. (dir.), Avocat et Ordre du XXIième siècle, 2014.
April 11, 2013
Organization of scientific events
La Régulation est plutôt liée à l'acte unilatéral, loi ou règlement. Regulation se traduit d'ailleurs par "réglementation".
Mais aujourd'hui, les contrats sont partout.
C'est pourquoi ce colloque annuel du Journal of Regulation est consacré au thème "Régulation et Contrat".
Pendant ce colloque, , des spécialistes exposent la pratique contractuelle en ce qu’elle a de spécifique dans tel ou tel secteur régulé, comme le ferroviaire, la banque, l’audiovisuel, le secteur des jeux ou de l’Internet. Puis des professeurs opèrent des "synthèses sur le banc" de ces exposés : il s’agit d’en tirer des observations plus synthétiques et abstraites, de comparer les secteurs, de les replacer dans les branches du droit et par rapport à la politique et à l’économie. Enfin, dans un troisième temps, des spécialistes abordent des questions plus transversales et thématiques.
Pour consulter le programme, cliquer ici.
Ce colloque donnera lieu à publication francophone dans la Revue de Jurisprudence Commerciale et à publication anglophone dans The Journal of Regulation.
May 31, 2012
Organization of scientific events
Ce colloque a été coorganisé entre The Journal of Regulation et KPMG.
La régulation bancaire touche non seulement toutes les entreprises, au-delà des banques, mais encore tous les êtres humains. Or,la technicité des discours et la fermeture des cénacles sont telles que ces questions de régulation bancaire ne sont pas « débattables » et que les personnes ordinaires, qui supportent les évolutions, n’ont pas leur mot à dire. Les enjeux et les risques politiques apparaissent alors.
Les deux sont donc liés et les interventions de la journée cherchent à satisfaire les deux objectifs : rendre débattable l’évolution de la régulation bancaire, alors même qu’elle paraît techniquement inextricable, parce qu’elle a des impacts considérables sur la vie des personnes qui doivent être en mesure de prendre la parole.
La légitimité des régulateurs impliqués serait renforcée de ce fait.
Ce colloque a été publié.
April 22, 2012
Organization of scientific events
Les secteurs régulés traditionnellement, par exemple l’énergie ou les télécommunications, ont un ancrage territorial très fort, ce qui les a rendus à première vue dominés par les États même s’ils étaient développés par des entreprises, en raison du lien entre l’État et le territoire. En outre, les États ont avec l’espace aérien un rapport consubstantiel car le contrôle de l’air par l’État assure la sécurité de celui-ci et de la population ; pourtant, l’État vend aujourd’hui des fréquences à des opérateurs privés. Plus encore, à la notion de territoire, le marché, qui est un espace défini par des activités et non plus nécessairement par un territoire, s’est superposé sur l’ensemble du droit économique, bouleversant notamment la notion et le rôle des frontières. Lorsqu’on observe les phénomènes en cours dans de nouveaux territoires, par exemple la zone euro, mais plus encore ce qui semble être des espaces sans territorialité, comme Internet, voire la finance, la géographie semble disparaître. Le dynamisme des opérateurs conduit par sa seule force à la constitution de nouvelles géographies qui ne doivent rien à la nature ni au pouvoir normatif des États, comme en matière d’infrastructure énergétique. Or, jusqu’ici, il n’y a eu de régulation que dans un rapport à l’égard d’une géographie ou s’appuyant sur une géographie.
Pourrait-on diagnostiquer la disparition de la géographie ou une transformation telle de celle-ci que les régulations elles-mêmes doivent se transformer radicalement ? C’est cette interrogation même qui est l’objet de ce colloque.
March 22, 2012
Organization of scientific events
Les secteurs régulés sont plus ou moins ancrés dans le territoire, ce qui permet de revenir sur le rapport entre l'économie, le droit et la géograpie.
Les secteurs régulés traditionnellement, par exemple l’énergie ou les télécommunications, ont un ancrage territorial très fort, ce qui les a rendus à première vue dominés par les Etats même s’ils étaient développés par des entreprises, en raison du lien entre l’Etat et le territoire. En outre, les Etats ont avec l’espace aérien un rapport consubstantiel car le contrôle de l’air par l’Etat assure la sécurité de celui-ci et de la population ; pourtant, l’Etat vend aujourd’hui des fréquences à des opérateurs privés.
En outre, à la notion de territoire, le marché, qui est un espace défini par des activités et non plus nécessairement par un territoire, s’est superposé sur l’ensemble du droit économique, bouleversant notamment la notion et le rôle des frontières. Lorsqu’on observe les phénomènes en cours dans de nouveaux territoires, par exemple la zone euro, mais plus encore ce qui semble être des espaces sans territorialité, comme Internet, voire la finance, la géographie semble disparaître. Le dynamisme des opérateurs conduit par sa seule force à la constitution de nouvelles géographies qui ne doivent rien à la nature ni au pouvoir normatif des Etats, comme en matière d’infrastructure énergétique.
Or, jusqu’ici, il n’y a eu de régulation que dans un rapport à l’égard d’une géographie ou s’appuyant sur une géographie. Pourrait-on diagnostiquer la disparition de la géographie ou une transformation telle de celle-ci que les régulations elles-mêmes doivent se transformer radicalement ?
Le colloque a pour ambition de poser les questions, d'en formuler les aspects et de cerner les réponses qui sont abordées aux éventuelles nouveautés.
Ce colloque a été publié.
Consulter la fiche générale du colloque annuel de The Journal of Regulation.
Jan. 19, 2012
Organization of scientific events
La richesse des interventions est venue notamment du fait que les orateurs appartenaient à des disciplines diverses et étaient soit français soit allemand par exemple le président français de l’autorité de la concurrence et le Président du Bundeskartellamt.
L’on observe que la notion même de compétitivité est fluctuante suivant que l’on se réfère à l’économie réelle ou à la finance. D’ailleurs, est discuté le point de savoir si les banques doivent être traitées par les autorités de concurrence comme des entreprises ordinaires ou au contraire comme des entreprises particulières.
Il ressort en tout cas nettement que les droits de la concurrence sont fondamentalement situés c'est-à-dire dépendent de la culture du pays et de son histoire, notamment l’ordo-libéralisme allemand, dans lequel la concurrence est une parti d’une politique plus générale dont l’autorité de concurrence n’a pas la charge et que l’Etat assure, l’ensemble devant être cohérent. La manifestation a montré à quel point la France et l’Allemagne ont des valeurs communes, dans leur conception de l’innovation ou du lien social, dont l’économie concurrentielle doit tenir compte.
En cela la micro-économie, si elle devait être trop universalisante, ne reflèterait pas la réalité.