Pour lire cette présentation en partie en français↗️ cliquer sur le drapeau français
► Full Reference : Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.), Compliance Monumental Goals, series "Compliance and Regulation", Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Bruylant, 2022, to be published.
📕 In parallel, a book in French Les Buts Monumentaux de la Compliance, is published in the collection "Régulations & Compliance" co-published by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Dalloz.
This book is inserted in this series created by Marie-Anne Frison-Roche for developing Compliance Law.
read the presentations of the other books of this Compliance Series : :
📘 Frison-Roche, M.-A. (dir.), Compliance Juridictionnalisation, 2022
📘 Frison-Roche, M.-A. (dir.), Compliance Tools, 2020
► Read the presentations of the other books on Compliance in this collection:
📘 Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.)), Compliance Juridictionnalisation, 2022
📘 Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.), Compliance Tools, 2020
► go to the general presentation of this Series Compliance & Regulation, conceived, founded et managed by Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, co-published par the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Bruylant.
► General construction of the book
After an Introduction on the definition of Monumental Goals and the normative anchoring of Compliance Law therein, a first Title is devoted to the "radioscopy" of this notion, in itself and branch of Law by branch of Law.
A second Title aims to measure how the Monumental Goals are questioned by a crisis situation, for example in a health situation, but not in that example, if they aggravate it and must be discarded, or if, on the contrary, they are exactly conceived for this hypothesis. of crisis, risks, catastrophes and that it is advisable to exploit them, in particular in order, in this "test", to benefit from the alliance between the political authorities, public powers and crucial operators.
Once made explicit and tested, the Monumental Goals must find a sure way to be taken into account. This is why a third Title aims to measure in principle and in practice how the Proportionality method can help the integration of Compliance, thus giving a new dimension to the Law without dragging it into insecurity and illegitimate grabbing of powers.
But because Compliance Monumental Goals express a very great ambition, the question of a bearable, even beneficial relationship with the international competitiveness of companies, standards and systems must be opened. This is the object of the fourth Title.
Finally, because the Monumental Goals express by nature a new ambition of the Law in a world which must not give up in what could be the prospect of its abyss, the fifth Title has for object the relationship between the Monumental Goals of Compliance and Sovereignty.
► General presentation of the book
The notion of "Compliance Monumental Goals " was proposed in 2016!footnote-1901. This notion is central in the Compliance mechanisms in that they can claim to constrain and cost those in which they are inserted only in that they tend to achieve goals whose substantial quality is to be "monumental" . The legal nature of this concept, its place in Compliance Law must be studied and challenged.
In addition, this notion is not obvious. Very serious arguments can be articulated against this notion. Compliance Monumental Goals must be justified, detailed, put into perspective and concretely illustrated, while their practical utility must be substantiated.
► Read the book articles presentations :
📝Bismuth, R., Compliance and Sovereignty: ambiguous relationships ;
📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Proportionality and Compliance ;
📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Role and Place of Companies in the Creation and Effectiveness of Compliance Law in Crisis ;
📝Oumedjkane, A., Tehrani, A. et Idoux, P., Public Norms and Compliance in times of Crisis: Monumental Goals tested: Elements for a Problematic ;