Sept. 15, 2021

Organization of scientific events

📅 Scientific Co-organization of the colloquium "Radioscopie d'une notion : les "buts monumentaux" de la Compliance ("Radioscopy of a notion: the Compliance "monumental goals""), in "Les buts monumentaux de la Compliance" ("Compliance Monumental Goals")"

ComplianceTechÂź ↗ pour lire la prĂ©sentation en français, cliquez sur le drapeau français

â–ș co-organized between Laboratoire DANTE and the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC), this colloquium) is the core manifestation of the 2021 series of colloquia devoted to the general theme of Compliance Monumental Goals.

It will take place on 16th of September 2021, at the Maison du Barreau, in Paris.

This first work is in French but  will be the basis of the book in English : Compliance Monumental Goals,

 đŸ“š  This book will be published in the Compliance & Regulation Series, co-published by the JoRC and Bruylant.

â–ș Presentation of the colloquium Thematic: To understand the notion of "Monumental Goals", it is firstly necessary to take crossed perspectives on them, particularly through the prism of Labor Law, Environmental Law and Enterprise Law. Many questions appear. Does the notion of “Monumental Goals” present any substance in Law? Is it uniformly understood, or do specificities appear, forged by specific cultures and disciplinary practices? What are the sources and implicit references or echoes? Because even if we admit the part of novelty, there is undoubtedly an anchoring in traditional legal concepts, like the general interest or sovereignty. How does the shift from meta-legal (prima facie introduced by the concept) to legal take place, and where do any operational difficulties lie when legal actors are called upon to act? The question of a possible categorization of "Monumental Goals" will thus be explored, through these three legal disciplines whose historicity, goals and implications for firms differ.  

These reflections allow to ask why and how these "Monumental Goals" are developed. Indeed, what is the relevance of the association of "Monumental Goals" and Compliance? Beyond theoretical considerations relating to the meaning of Law, is this really an effective alloy encouraging companies to behave differently? By what ways? These questions arise in particular with regard to the imperatives of legal certainty and the operative nature of the concept. The question of "Monumental Goals" will thus be explored by the operational actors of compliance, both those who act within companies and those who act from the lato sensu State sphere, for understanding whether this notion is a pure rhetoric figure or constitutes a particularly promising lever for the evolution of market behavior.

 

â–ș with : 

đŸŽ€ Christophe AndrĂ©, maĂźtre de confĂ©rences Ă  l'UniversitĂ© Paris - Saclay (lecturer at the Paris-Saclay University)

đŸŽ€ Guillaume Beaussonie, professeur Ă  l'UniversitĂ© Toulouse-1-Capitole (law professor at Toulouse-1-Capitole University)

đŸŽ€ Regis Bismuthprofesseur de droit Ă  Sciences po, Paris (law professor at Sciences po Paris)

đŸŽ€ Marie-Emma Boursierdoyen  de l'UniversitĂ© Paris - Saclay (dean of the Paris-Saclay University)

đŸŽ€ Muriel Chagny, professeur l'UniversitĂ© Paris - Saclay, directrice du Laboratoire Dante (Professor at the Paris-Saclay University, director of the Laboratory Dante)

đŸŽ€ Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, professeur Ă  Sciences po (Paris) (Professor at Sciences Po Paris)

đŸŽ€ Isabelle Gavanon, avocate Ă  la Cour d'Appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)

đŸŽ€ Emma Guernaoui, ATER Ă  l'UniversitĂ© Paris II PanthĂ©on-Assas (ATER at Paris II PanthĂ©on-Assas University)

đŸŽ€ Dominique Heintz, avocat Ă  la Cour d' appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)

đŸŽ€ Christian Huglo, avocat Ă  la Cour d' appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)

đŸŽ€Dominique de La Garanderieavocat Ă  la Cour d'appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal) 

đŸŽ€ Anne-ValĂ©rie Le Fur, professeur Ă  l'UniversitĂ© Paris - Saclay (Professor at Paris-Saclay University)

đŸŽ€ Anne Le Goff, secrĂ©taire gĂ©nĂ©rale dĂ©lĂ©guĂ©e d'ArkĂ©a (Deputy Secretary general at ArkĂ©a)

đŸŽ€ Roch-Olivier Maistre, prĂ©sident du Conseil supĂ©rieur de l'audiovisuel (President of the French audiovisual regulation authority)

đŸŽ€ Marie Malaurie, professeur Ă  l'UniversitĂ© Paris-Saclay (professor at the Paris-Saclay University)

đŸŽ€ JĂ©rĂŽme Marilly, avocat gĂ©nĂ©ral Ă  la Cour d'Appel de Paris (General attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)

đŸŽ€ BenoĂźt PetitmaĂźtre de confĂ©rences (HDR) Ă  l'UniversitĂ© Paris-Saclay (lecturer at the Paris-Saclay University) 

đŸŽ€ Jean-François Vaquieri, SecrĂ©taire GĂ©nĂ©ral d'Enedis (Secretary General of Enedis)

____

Read a detailed presentation below:

 

The « Monumental Goals Â» of Compliance Law:

Radioscopy of a notion

 

This manifestation will be in French, but the book based on it will be published in English

 

Under the scientifique direction of

Christophe André, Marie Malaurie and Benoßt Petit

 

Inaugural colloquium of the cycle of colloquia around the general theme 

Compliance Monumental Goals

 

Thursday 16th of September 2021, Paris, from 9 am to 6.30 pm 

Amphitheater of Maison du Barreau

2 rue de Harley, 75001, Paris

 

9 am – 9.10 am. Foreword by Marie-Emma Boursier, doyen  de l'UniversitĂ© Paris - Saclay (Dean of Versailles-Saint-Quentin Law Faculty)

 

9.10 am – 9.25 am.  Introductive words by Muriel Chagny, directrice du Laboratoire Dante (Director of Dante Laboratory)

 

I- THE INTERESTS CONCERNED BY MONUMENTAL GOALS: CROSSED LOOK

Presidency of BenoĂźt Petit, maĂźtre de confĂ©rences Ă  la FacultĂ© de droit de Versailles-Saint-Quentin (senior lecturer at Versailles-Saint-Quentin Law Faculty) 

To understand the notion of "Monumental Goals", it is firstly necessary to take crossed perspectives on them, particularly through the prism of Labor Law, Environmental Law and Enterprise Law. Many questions appear. Does the notion of “Monumental Goals” present any substance in Law? Is it uniformly understood, or do specificities appear, forged by specific cultures and disciplinary practices? What are the sources and implicit references or echoes? Because even if we admit the part of novelty, there is undoubtedly an anchoring in traditional legal concepts, like the general interest or sovereignty. How does the shift from meta-legal (prima facie introduced by the concept) to legal take place, and where do any operational difficulties lie when legal actors are called upon to act? The question of a possible categorization of "Monumental Goals" will thus be explored, through these three legal disciplines whose historicity, goals and implications for firms differ.  

 

9.30 am - 10.45 am. "Monumental Goals" with regard to the interests concerned into the firm

  • The organization of the monumental goals of labor relations law: a shifting and often paradoxical whole, by BenoĂźt PetitmaĂźtre de confĂ©rences Ă  la FacultĂ© de droit de Versailles-Saint-Quentin (senior lecturer at Versailles-Saint-Quentin Law Faculty) 

 

  • Interest and “raison d’ĂȘtre” of the company: how does it fit together with the Compliance Monumental Goals?, by Anne-ValĂ©rie Le Furprofesseur Ă  l'UniversitĂ© Paris - Saclay (Full Professor at Paris-Saclay University)

 

  • In the Enterprise, relations between Compliance and Monumental Goals in social  areas,by Dominique de La Garanderieavocat Ă  la Cour d'appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal) 

 

10.45 am - 11 am. Coffee Break

 

11 am - 12.45 pm. "Monumental Goals" with regards to interests concerned beyond the firm

  • Under what conditions could Climate Law constitute a priority monumental goal for Compliance?, by Christian Hugloavocat Ă  la Cour d' appel de Paris (Attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)

 

  • Monumental Goals and Market Law, by Marie Malaurieprofesseur Ă  l'UniversitĂ© Paris-Saclay (full Professor at the Paris-Saclay University)

 

  • Monumental Goals in supplier - distributor relations, by  Dominique Heintzavocat Ă  la Cour d' appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)

 

  • Compliance Monumental Goals: complement or competitors to the notion of Public Interest?, by Emma Guernaoui, Montpellier University 

 

  • The Ambiguous Relations between Compliance and Sovereignty, by Regis Bismuthprofesseur de droit Ă  Sciences po, Paris  (full law professor at Sciences po Paris)

 

II- THE OUTLINES OF THE MONUMENTAL GOAL NOTION: WHAT UTILITY? 

 

These reflections allow to ask why and how these "Monumental Goals" are developed. Indeed, what is the relevance of the association of "Monumental Goals" and Compliance? Beyond theoretical considerations relating to the meaning of Law, is this really an effective alloy encouraging companies to behave differently? By what ways? These questions arise in particular with regard to the imperatives of legal certainty and the operative nature of the concept. The question of "Monumental Goals" will thus be explored by the operational actors of compliance, both those who act within companies and those who act from the lato sensu State sphere, for understanding whether this notion is a pure rhetoric figure or constitutes a particularly promising lever for the evolution of market behavior.

 

2.30 pm - 4 pm. First round table: "Monumental goals perceived by the firm: serene business or business under pressure?

Round table animated by Christophe AndrĂ©maĂźtre de confĂ©rences Ă  l'UniversitĂ© Paris - Saclay (senior lecturer at the Paris-Saclay University)

  • Anne Le GoffsecrĂ©taire gĂ©nĂ©rale dĂ©lĂ©guĂ©e d'ArkĂ©a (Deputy Secretary general at ArkĂ©a)
  • Jean-François VaquieriSecrĂ©taire GĂ©nĂ©ral d'Enedis (Secretary General of Enedis)
  • Isabelle Gavanonavocate Ă  la Cour d'Appel de Paris (Attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)

 

4 pm - 4.20 pm. Coffee Break 

 

4.20 pm - 6 pm. Second round table: "Monumental Goals" used by public authorities 

Round table animated by Guillaume Beaussonieprofesseur Ă  l'UniversitĂ© Toulouse-1-Capitole (full law professor at Toulouse-1-Capitole University)

  • JĂ©rĂŽme Marillyavocat gĂ©nĂ©ral Ă  la Cour d'Appel de Paris (Advocate General before the Paris Court of Appeal)
  • Roch-Olivier MaistreprĂ©sident du Conseil supĂ©rieur de l'audiovisuel (President of the French Audiovisual Regulatory Authority)

 

6 pm. Synthesis of the works and conclusive words by Marie-Anne Frison-Rocheprofesseur Ă  Sciences po (Paris) (Full Professor at Sciences Po Paris)

comments are disabled for this article