13 avril 2022

Responsabilités éditoriales : Direction de la série Regulation & Compliance, JoRC et Bruylant

📘 Compliance Monumental Goals

par Marie-Anne Frison-Roche (ed.)

To read this presentation totally in English↗️ click on the British flag

► Référence générale : Frison-Roche, M.-A. (dir.), Compliance Monumental Goals, série "Compliance & Régulations ", Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Bruylant, 2022, à paraître.

____

 

📕Parallèlement, un ouvrage en français, Les Buts Monumentaux de la Compliance, est publié dans la collection coéditée par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Dalloz . 

📅  Les  Les deux ouvrage font suite à  un cycle de colloques 2021 organisés par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et des Universités qui lui sont partenaires.

____

 

Ce volume s'insère dans la ligne de cette collection créée par Marie-Anne Frison-Roche pour développer le Droit de la Compliance :

📚   Lire les autres ouvrages de la Collection portant sur la Compliance :

📘  Frison-Roche, M.-A. (dir.), Compliance Juridictionnalisation2022

📘  Frison-Roche, M.-A. (dir.), Compliance Tools, 2020

 

► Consulter l'ensemble de la Collection Compliance & Regulations , conçue, fondée et dirigée par Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, coéditée par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance et Bruylant,.

 

___

►Construction générale de l'ouvrage

After an Introduction on the definition of Monumental Goals and the normative anchoring of Compliance Law therein, a first Title is devoted to the "radioscopy" of this notion, in itself and branch of Law by branch of Law.

second Title aims to measure how the Monumental Goals are questioned by a crisis situation, for example in a health situation, but not in that example, if they aggravate it and must be discarded, or if, on the contrary, they are exactly conceived for this hypothesis. of crisis, risks, catastrophes and that it is advisable to exploit them, in particular in order, in this "test", to benefit from the alliance between the political authorities, public powers and crucial operators.

Once made explicit and tested, the Monumental Goals must find a sure way to be taken into account. This is why a third Title aims to measure in principle and in practice how the Proportionality method can help the integration of Compliance, thus giving a new dimension to the Law without dragging it into insecurity and illegitimate grabbing of powers.

But because Compliance Monumental Goals express a very great ambition, the question of a bearable, even beneficial relationship with the international competitiveness of companies, standards and systems must be opened. This is the object of the fourth Title.  

Finally, because the Monumental Goals express by nature a new ambition of the Law in a world which must not give up in what could be the prospect of its abyss, the fifth Title has for object the relationship between the Monumental Goals of Compliance and Sovereignty.

____

 

►Présentation générale de l'ouvrage

The notion of "Compliance Monumental Goals " was proposed in 2016!footnote-1901. This notion is central in the Compliance mechanisms in that they can claim to constrain and cost those in which they are inserted only in that they tend to achieve goals whose substantial quality is to be "monumental" . The legal nature of this concept, its place in Compliance Law must be studied and challenged. 

In addition, this notion is not obvious. Very serious arguments can be articulated against this notion. Compliance Monumental Goals must be justified, detailed, put into perspective and concretely illustrated, while their practical utility must be substantiated.

 

► Lire l'avant-propos résumant l'ensemble des contributions de l'ouvrage. 

 

► Lire les présentation de quelques articles composant l'ouvrage :

 

📝André, Ch.,  Compliance Monumental Goals, vectors of « common » social values.  Perspectives from a Criminal Lawyer

 

📝Bär-Bouyssière, B., Practical obstacles to the effective place of Proportionality in Compliance

 

📝Bismuth, R., Compliance and Sovereignty: ambiguous relationships ;

 

📝Bonnet, J., The Crisis, an opportunity to seize Compliance as a Mode of Communication by Public Authorities ; 

 

📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Definition of Proportionality and Definition of Compliance ; 

 

📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Role and Place of Companies in the Creation and Effectiveness of Compliance Law in Crisis ; 

 

📝Le Fur, A.-V., Interest and “raison d’être” of the company: how do they fit with the Compliance Monumental Goals? ;

 

📝Oumedjkane, A., Tehrani, A. et Idoux, P., Public Norms and Compliance in times of Crisis: Monumental Goals tested: Elements for a Problematic ; 

 

📝Petit, B., The Arrangement of the Monumental Goals of Labor Law: a Moving and Often Paradoxical Whole

 

 

_______

 

les commentaires sont désactivés pour cette fiche