Série "Régulations & Compliance"
► Full Reference: Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.), La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance, série "Régulations & Compliance", Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Dalloz, 2022, to be published.
📘 In parallel, the English version of this book, Compliance Jurisdictionalisation, is published in the series co-published by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Bruylant.
This volume is the continuation of the books dedicated to Compliance in this collection.
► Read the presentations of the other books on Compliance in this collection:
📕 Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.), Les buts monumentaux de la Compliance, 2022
📕 Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.), Les outils de la Compliance, 2020
📕 Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.), Pour une Europe de la Compliance, 2019
📕Borga, N., Marin, J.Cl. Roda, J.-Ch. (ed.), Compliance : Entreprise, Régulateur, Juge, 2018
📕 Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.), Régulation, Supervision, Compliance, 2017
📕Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.), Internet, espace d'interrégulation, 2016
📕 Read the presentations of the other titles of the collection.
► General presentation of the book : There have always been Judges and Lawyers in Compliance Law, in particular because this branch of Law is an extension of Regulatory Law in which they have a core place. This results from the fact that the decisions taken in respect of Compliance are contestable in Court, including Arbitration, those issued by the Company, such as those of States or Authorities, the Judge in turn becoming what Compliance Law is effective.
The novelty lies more in the phenomenon of "jurisdictionalization", that is to say that the trial model penetrates all Compliance Law, and not only the Ex Post part that it includes. Moreover, it seems that this jurisdictionalization influences the non-legal dimension of Compliance. This movement has effects that must be measured and causes that must be understood. Advantages and disadvantages that must be balanced. If only to form an opinion vis-à-vis Companies that have become Prosecutors and Judges of themselves and others ...: encourage this "Juridictionalization of Compliance", fight it, perhaps influence it? In any case, understand it!
► Lire l'avant-propos résumant l'ensemble des contributions de l'ouvrage
► Read the first presentations of some articles of the book :
📝Augagneur, L.-M., Le traitement réputationnel par et sur les plateformes
📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Ne jamais se passer des juges et des avocats dans le Droit de la Compliance
📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Le rôle du Juge dans le Droit de la Compliance
📝 Frison-Roche, M.-A., Le jugeant- jugé ; articuler les mots et les choses face à l'impossible conflit d'intérêts
📝 Heymann, J., La nature juridique de la "Cour suprême" de Facebook
📝Latour, D., Les enquêtes internes au sein des entreprises
📝Merabet, S., Etre juge et ne pas juger
📝Racine, J.-B., Compliance et Arbitrage : Introduction générale
📝Toe, S., L’application judiciaire des normes de la compliance en remède aux insuffisances des procédures collectives