Thesaurus : Doctrine

SILLIMAN, Bryan🕴️

📝Secret professionnel et coopération : les leçons de procédure tirées de l’expérience américaine pour une application universelle, in 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance

pour lire cette présentation en français ↗️cliquer sur le drapeau français

â–ş Full reference: B. Silliman, "Secret professionnel et coopĂ©ration : les leçons de procĂ©dure tirĂ©es de l’expĂ©rience amĂ©ricaine pour une application universelle" ("Privilege and cooperation, procedural lessons learned from the U.S for global application"), in M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), La juridictionnalisation de la Complianceserie "RĂ©gulations & Compliance", Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Dalloz, 2023, p. 231-234.  

____

đź“•read a general presentation of the book, La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance, in which this article is published

____

â–ş Summary of the article (done by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance): The French legal system is evolving, organizing interaction between lawyers with regulators and prosecutors, especially in investigations about corruption or corporate misconduct, adopting U.S. negotiated resolutions such as the Convention judiciaire d'intĂ©rĂŞt public, which encourages "collaboration" between them. 

The author describes the evolution of the U.S. DOJ doctrine and askes French to be inspired by the U.S. procedural experience, U.S. where this mechanism came from. Indeed, the DOJ released memoranda about what the "collaboration" means. At the end (2006 Memorandum), the DOJ has considered that the legal privilege must remain intact when the information is not only factual to maintain trust between prosecutors, regulators, and lawyers.

French authorities do not follow this way. The author regrets it and thinks they should adopt the same reasoning as the American authority on the secret professionnel of the avocat, especially when he intervenes in the company internal investigation.

________

comments are disabled for this article