► Référence complète : A. Menais (dir.), Raison d'être, engagement et responsabilité​, préf. B. Le Marie, postace O. Grégoire, EMS Éditions, 2022, 192 p.

____

► Présentation de l'ouvrage (faite par l'éditeur) :  C’est une révolution calme, certes, mais une vraie révolution sociétale que la loi Pacte a engagée.

Au-delà du droit, c’est en effet un nouvel espace qui s’ouvre pour équilibrer les relations entre État, entreprises et individus ; un espace qui permet de construire au-delà du capitalisme à un moment où les effets de la pandémie mondiale ont créé, de facto, les conditions du changement.

Cet ouvrage collectif ne prétend pas résoudre l’apparent paradoxe entre attentes de changements profonds sur le long terme et envie d’immédiateté de résultats, mais bien de mettre en lumière les enjeux juridiques, humains et sociaux, en particulier la responsabilité de l’entreprise et de ses dirigeants, qu’emportent les nouvelles notions établies par la loi du 22 mai 2019.

Les témoignages des experts en ressources humaines, en théories des organisations, des investisseurs, des économistes et des dirigeants, contributeurs à cet ouvrage, permettent d’appréhender les défi s inédits dévoilés par la définition des raisons d’être et des missions pour l’entreprise. Ils livrent des regards différents et complémentaires sur la nouvelle finalité des entreprises et des institutions : leur raison d’être. Ce sont des pionniers engagés qui témoignent de leurs choix, du chemin qu’ils ont parcouru et parfois entamé bien avant que la loi n’existe, et des attentes nées de ce changement.

____

► Auteurs des contributions : Jean-Paul Agon, Jean-David Aurange, Ludovic Aventin, Jean-Paul Berthomé, Christophe Bonduelle, Franck Carnero, Sophie Chambon-Diallo, Yves Chapot, Hervé Coureil, Jean-Marc Daniel, Bruno Dondero, Emmanuelle Duez, Charlotte Duthoo, Geneviève Férone-Creuzet, Ashley Grice, Nicolas Guérin, Armand Hatchuel, Martin Hitzer, Augustin Jaclin, Emery Jacquillat, Sophie Javary, Eric Labaye, Kevin Levillain, Caroline de la Marnierre, Adeline Lescanne Gautier, Helle Liautaud, Didier Martin, Colin Mayer, Lynn Paine, Alissa Pelatan, Alexandre Perra, Fanny Picard, Floriane de Saint Pierre, Blanche Segrestin, Julie Serrier, Dominique Stucki, Thibault de Tersant, Mathias Vicherat et Frank Wismer

____

► Full Reference: Frison-Roche, M.-A., Globalization from the point of view of Law, working paper, May 2017.

____

🎤 This working paper initially served as a basis for a synthesis report made in French in the colloquium organized by the Association Henri Capitant in the International German Days on the subject of "Le Droit et la Mondialisation" (Law and Globalization).

📝 Il sert dans un second temps de base à l'article paru dans l'ouvrage La Mondialisation.

📝 it serves as a second basis for the article (written in English, with a Spanish Summary) to be published in the Brezilian journal Rarb - Revista de Arbitragem e Mediação  (Revue d`Arbitrage et Médiation).

It uses the Bilingual Dictionary of the Law of Regulation and Compliance.

____

► Summary of the Working: Globalization is a confusing phenomenon for the jurist. The first thing to do is to take its measure. Once it has been taken, it is essential that we allow ourselves to think of something about it, even if we have to think about it. For example, on whether the phenomenon is new or not, which allows a second assessment of what is taking place. If, in so far as the law can and must "pretend" to defend every being, a universal claim destined to face the global field of forces, the following question - but secondary - is formulated: quid facere? Nothing ? Next to nothing ? Or regulate? Or can we still claim that the Law fulfills its primary duty, which is to protect the weak, including the forces of globalization?

____

read the Working Paper below⤵️

Reference : Frison-Roche, M.-A., Le contrat est-il l'instrument optimal de la RSE ? ("Is the Contract the optimal instrument of CSR?")  in Trébulle, F.-G. (modérateur), Les instruments de la RSE : le contrat (The instruments of CSR"), cycle of conferences organized by the Cour de cassation (French Civil Supreme Court and the Universities of Paris-Dauphine, Paris VIII and Paris I),Cour de cassation, Paris, 11 mai 2017.

Read the slides (in French) as served as the basis of the conference les slides

Read the program on the Cour de cassation  wesite (in French).

Read the program of the whole cycle of conferences in which this conference enters (in French)

Corporate Social Responsibility belongs to Economic Law. It thus enters into its logic of efficiency, leading to apprehend any legal mechanism as an instrument, the contract as the others. This does not mean that everything is only an instrument, on the contrary. Economic Law, when it takes the form of Regulation Law, places the principles in the aims pursued. It is in these principles that it can meet CSR if the goals are the same.

In view of these aims, everything is an instrument. On the scale of goals which are "monumental"!footnote-916, in that they are global, in that they seem unattainable, such as the fight against child labor, such as the end of corruption or the sale of human beings, all legal instruments become interchangeable, from the Constitution to the contract, from the hard law to the soft law. The only criterion becomes efficiency to achieve the goal. We then reach the efficiency, criterion of the Regulation Law.

New laws, such as in France in 2016 the Sapin 2 law or in 2017 the law establishing a "duty of vigilance" with uncertain contours, may use the contract only as a vehicle for legal obligations to be performed by the company!footnote-917. The contract becomes an instrument of the Compliance Law, chosen as the optimal instrument of the Internalized Regulation Law in the company.

But the contract can also be chosen as an instrument by the company in that it pursues the same goals of general interest, becoming global!footnote-918. The contract is then chosen as an Ex Ante tool, which will be refined to the specificity of the company, exceeded the generality of the law and which will be able to resolve the diversity of national laws by more comprehensive contractual relations. Moreover, the contract can integrate active Ex Post mechanisms, such as the warning launcher or the controller, audits, or even form an ecosystem by training clauses to disseminate a CSR culture. By these contractual provisions, the contract operates the mixing of times, the Ex-Ante and the Ex Post, which the legislation can not do, refines it to what the particular enterprise is .

In this, the contract converges towards what is being constructed: a Compliance Law.

Toulouse School of Economics, Conference in Law and Economics

Organizers : Simone M. Sepe and Jean Tirole

Read the program.

Read The Working Paper (in French and in English)

See the speech plan

See the slides

Référence complète : Directive  2014/95/UE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 octobre 2014 modifiant la directive 2013/34/UE en ce qui concerne la publication d'informations non financières et d'informations relatives à la diversité par certaines grandes entreprises et certains groupes

Lire le texte de la Directive.