June 25, 2021
Compliance: at the moment
📧 To regulate food sector, do not legally design everything in terms of markets, design in terms of chains, and companies connecting upstream and downstream
►Under the scientific direction of Professor Emmanuelle Claudel, the French Association Droit et Commerce devotes its annual conference to ➡️📅 "La concurrence dans tous ses états". In her introduction retracing the entire evolution of this Law, Emmanuelle Claudel underlined that competition Law takes a distance from its basic concepts, such as the notion of "market". The branch of Law is finding more and more points of contact with Regulatory and Compliance Law.
In fact, in an economic and social system whose organization needs to be readjusted, the notion of “chain" must find its rightful place in conjunction with the notion of "market". For many objects, it is relevant to think not only in terms of "market" but in terms of chains. Indeed the "chain" gives consistency to the object itself. For example forests or food, as European Commission did (I).
But looking more concretely at the economic space, directly seeing people and things, such as agricultural products and what they are used for, that is to say to feed human beings, then this "Monumental Goal" must be entrusted to Crucial Entreprises the task of achieving it (II). Compliance Law can in the future caring of this, by setting new obligations, but also by loosening the so violent relationship, by its very indifference, between competition and food products.
I. NO LONGER THINK ONLY IN TERMS OF "MARKETS" BUT IN TERMS OF CHAIN: THE EXAMPLE FROM THE FARM TO THE FORK
We are starting to assert this for the forest but also for agriculture that the European Commission now connects with food. So food should not be seen simply as a succession of "markets". In fact, if we only conceive them in this way, the agricultural markets, which should benefit from the financing offered by financial markets, are sometimes grabbed by them, which can literally starve the world rather than helping to feed it.
Today, we agree to think about agriculture as a "chain" and, as the European Commission writes: From farm to fork. Indeed if agriculture is an important "sector" it is because it allows to feed the population. This basic fact has often been forgotten, in particular because competition Law, based on trade in products and not on the products themselves (of which it only measures the substituability, to identify the relevant markets) is not interested in what things are made for. We should not blame it, but in return, it cannot claim to dominate everything, since it is only pertinent for this small part of our life.
European Commission, which is emerging more and more from the neutral notion of the market to move towards the substantive notions of products and of what they are made for, of their results (happy or unhappy), is in the process of setting up an industrial policy and what could be a real agricultural policy, which is not made only of subsidies.
It consists in saying that it is necessary to design a chain which starts from the soil, its agricultural and livestock use to achieve what it is for: feeding the population.
It seems simple, but in a Law dominated by the sole Competition Law, which fought for example by the techniques of price support, it is a new way, because it is concrete, to conceive.
But how to do it ?
Because Economy does not necessarily have to be administered, Compliance Law can be of great help, especially through the wholesale markets.
II. INTERNALIZING THE MONUMENTAL GOALS OF AGRICULTURAL SECTORS IN THEIR CRUCIAL ENTERPRISES
Rather than administering the sectors, it is advisable to internalize in crucial companies the Monumental Goals which concern the future of the social group, for example feeding the population.
It is for this reason that we must conceive "wholesale markets", not only as does Competition Law, which qualifies them as markets between the producers and the resellers, but as companies which are, within vital chains, are in charge of supervising the link between upstream and downstream so that the goal is realized.
This is why these companies are directly concerned by Compliance Law, in its not mechanical definition of Compliance with the legal requirements applicable to them (which is our obligation to all) but in its definition which puts Compliance as something beyond Competition Law (➡️📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Competition Law and Compliance Law, 2018)
Wholesale markets for food therefore have a decisive role to play, as demonstrated by the French Rungis market company which, during the time of the health crisis, helped to ensure the continuity of supply (see more generally Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Montpellier University, ➡️📅colloquium Public Norms and Compliance in times of crisis: monumental goals put to the test, contributions serving as a basis for a chapter in ➡️📘Compliance Monumental Goals, 2022).
The internalization of these Goals in Companies resolves the aporia with which States are confronted in their intimacy with the notion of borders.
Indeed, il is useful to adopt a definition of "wholesale markets" no longer through the definition of the "market" but through the definition of "the crucial enterprise", which is itself "regulated" (Frison- Roche, M.-A., ➡️📝The Crucial Companies and their Regulation, 2014).
"Wholesale markets" are businesses where retailers go to get their supplies every day, remembering what the market place was like, remembering the time when the market is the place where human beings met, where the exchanges were not between capital and commodities but between people (Supiot, A., ➡️📕Mondialisation ou Globalisation, 2019).
These companies are grouped together in a global association: the World Union of Wholesale Markets. For wholesale companies, it is a question of coming together to ensure that the chains operate from soil maintenance to the mouths of human beings.
Because it is so difficult to find a World Regulator which is at the same time legitimate and effective in agricultural matters.
It is possible that a public regulator is more legitimate but it is for the moment impossible to establish worldwide (see generally ➡️📕Collart-Dutilleul, Fr. and Le Dolley, E., ed., Droit, économie et marchés de matières premières agricoles, 2013).
Therefore, an alliance between the political authorities, which care about public health and crucial companies, of which these "wholesale markets" are an example, by "Compliance Obligations" thus understood, is a concrete prospect.
This then results in an obligation and a power of Vigilance and coordination, which can already be found in banking (a sector where Compliance Law is more mature than elsewhere) which must develop, rather than being the object of the segmentation that, by nature, traditional Competition Law generates, market by market, market against market.
June 21, 2021
Compliance: at the moment
📧Regarding Compliance: Observations on the first steps of the European Public Prosecutor and her conception of the EPPO's Action: on Health, Infrastructures and Agriculture
► It is in its "Risk and Compliance" section that the Wall Street Journal, by its article of June 18, 2021 (➡️📝Europe's Chief Prosecutor Has 300 Cases on Her Plate Already), presents the first steps of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, since June 1, 2021.
This inclusion presupposes that it is through a Compliance Law perspective that this new body must be understood, in order to understand and anticipate its action.
►In this perspective :
➡️📧Frison-Roche, M.-A., European Public Prosecutor's Office comes on stage: the company having itself become a private prosecutor, are we going towards an alliance of all prosecutors?, June 2, 2021
➡️ 💬Frison-Roche, « Le parquet européen est un apport considérable au Droit de la Compliance » (“The European Public Prosecutor's Office is a remarkable contribution to Compliance Law"), June 14, 2021
I. AN ACTION THAT WILL FOCUS ON FIGHTING THE MEANS USED TO DAMAGE THE FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
The article of the Wall Street Journal takes the form of an interview with the European Prosecutor. Her responses also confirm the consubstantial link between European Public Prosecutor's Office and Compliance Law.
It is remarkable that she immediately says that she hopes the treatment of many cases, especially on healthcare and infrastructure sectors: "Our expectation is to have more cases, especially in the healthcare system, in public procurement, infrastructure, and also in agriculture ".
However, the 2017 European Regulation which established the European Public Prosecutor’s Office said that its "mandate" is to prosecute offenses affecting the "financial interests of the European Union", without being hampered by the cumbersome procedures for cooperation between States while these offenses are most often cross-border.
But one could think that, knowingly taking the means (corruption, money laundering) for the goal, the European Public Prosecutor's Office would immediately pursue not only the defense of the financial interests of the Union (admittedly financial interests damaged by corruption or money laundering) but these facts themselves: thus the European Public Prosecutor's Office works with the European Supervisory Authorities, in particular banking and financial authorities, which fight in Ex Ante against these offenses and prevent them.
II. AN ACTION THAT FOCUSES ON SECTORS NOT LEGALLY REGULATED IN EX ANTE BY SECTORAL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES
Moreover, it will be noted that the European Prosecutor is targeting three economic sectors which are not "regulated sectors" in the legal sense of the qualification, that is to say not monitored by a sectoral Regulatory and/or Supervision Authority: Health, Infrastructure and Agriculture.
Thus, the power of Regulatory Law, which relies in its Ex Ante, and its weakness, which derives from the pre-required existence of a sectoral Authority, is compensated: the action of the Public Prosecutor's Office is not limited to legally regulated sectors.
While Competition Authorities are mandated (➡️📅La concurrence dans tous ses états, June 25 and 26, 2021) to protect the competitive functioning of the markets, a Public Prosecutor's Office can deal with any infringement without having to determine a market.
For instance, Infrastructures don't constitute pertinent markets but can constitute fields for criminal activities, such as corruption or money laundering, justifying Compliance Law mechanisms.
What the new European Prosecutor is aiming for, namely Health, Infrastructures and Agriculture, have undoubtedly been damaged both by the sole primacy of the Competition perspective and by a Criminal Law constrained by the difficult inter-State cooperation, even though they are not subject to a supranational Ex Ante Regulation.
The European Public Prosecutor's Office aims to directly improve this, through Entreprises acting in Health, Infrastructures and Agriculture.
April 21, 2016
Thesaurus : Doctrine
Référence complète : Mélanges en l'honneur de Jehan de Malafosse, LexisNexis, 2016, 513 p.
Feb. 11, 2016
Thesaurus : 02. Lois
La loi nouvelle modifie le Code de l'environnement.
Le nouvel article L.541-4 du Code de l'environnement vise les priorités de la lutte contre le gaspillage, .
1. La prévention du gaspillage alimentaire
2. L'utilisation des invendus propres à la consommation humaine, par le don ou la transformation
3. La valorisation destinée à l'alimentation animale
4. L'utilisation à des fins de compost pour l'agriculture ou la valorisation énergétique, notamment par méthanisation.
L'article suivant (article L.541-5) pose que "les distributeurs du secteur alimentaire assurent la commercialisation de leurs denrées alimentaires ou leur valorisation conformément à cette hiérarchie". Ils ne peuvent délibérément rendre leurs invendus impropres à la consommation.
La loi pose qu'une stipulation contractuelle ne peut s'opposer au "don de denrées alimentaires vendeurs sous marque de distributeur par un opérateur du secteur alimentaire à un association caritative habilitée
Dec. 2, 2013
Référence complète : FRISON-ROCHE, Marie-Anne, Quelle (s) autorité (s) de régulation pour les marchés de matières premières agricoles ?, in COLLART DUTILLEUL, François et LE DOLLEY, Erik (dir.), Droit, économie et marchés de matières premières agricoles, coll. "Droit et Économie", Lextenso éditions - L.G.D.J., 2013, p.267-283.
Lire une présentation générale du volume dans lequel la contribution s'insère.
Lire le résumé de l'article ci-dessous.
Nov. 21, 2013
Thesaurus : Doctrine
Références complètes : Collart Dutilleul, F. et Hugou, B., Problématiques juridiques des marchés à terme de matières premières agricoles, in Collart Dutilleul, F. et Le Dolley, É. (dir.), Droit, économie et marchés de matières premières agricoles, coll. "Droit et Économie", L.D.G.J - Lextenso éditions, 2013, p.3-15.
Les étudiants de Sciences po peuvent lire l'article via le drive de Sciences po, dossier "MAFR - Régulation".
March 20, 2013
Dans un colloque très complet de deux journées, cette intervention particulière porte sur les autorités de régulation, telles qu’elles sont en train d’être mises en place, et telles qu’il convient de les concevoir. Mais cette perspective institutionnelle ne doit pas conduire à avoir une vision désincarnée du sujet. En effet, et en premier lieu, c’est sans doute, avant tout, la matière agricole, parce qu’elle nourrit les êtres humains, qui doit être considérée pour construire le système d’autorité de régulation, et non pas seulement le fait qu’il s’agit de matières premières, parmi d’autres matières premières, encore moins des produits financiers, sous prétexte que la financiarisation a été l’élément déclencheur du besoin de régulation. En second lieu, la question est de savoir si l’autorité doit être mondiale, nationale ou régionale. On peut espérer pouvoir construire des autorités régionales. Cela rejoint l’espoir que l’on met dans l’Europe, une Europe qui ne soit pas seulement concurrentielle et qui, dépassant les politiques étatiques, ne se réduise pourtant pas au marché.
Lire le programme du colloque.
Accéder aux slides de la conférence.
Accéder à l'article publié à la suite de la conférence;
Lire la présentation générale de l'ouvrage publié par la suite dans la collection "Droit et Economie".
March 7, 2006
March 7, 2006
Organization of scientific events
Oct. 12, 2005
Référence complète : FRISON-ROCHE, Marie-Anne, Appliquer le droit de la régulation au secteur agricole, Revue Lamy Concurrence, n°4, août/octobre 2005, 126-130.
July 16, 2004
March 11, 2004