29 February 2024 · · Marie-Anne Frison-Roche et Matthieu Boissavy (dir.)

🏗️ copublishing and direction of the collection: 📚Régulations & Compliance

Publication of 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche & 🕴️M. Boissavy (eds.), 📕Compliance et droits de la défense. Enquête interne – CJIP – CRPC (Compliance and rights of the defence. Internal investigation – French Judicial Public Interest Agreement – French guilty plea procedure)

LinkedIn X
Couverture – Compliance et droits de la défense

â–ş Full Reference: M.-A. Frison-Roche & M. Boissavy (eds.), Compliance et droits de la dĂ©fense. EnquĂŞte interne â€“ CJIP – CRPC (Compliance and rights of the defence. Internal investigation â€“ French Judicial Public Interest Agreement â€“ French guilty plea procedure), Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Dalloz, “RĂ©gulations & Compliance” Serie, 2024, 362 p.

____

â–ş General presentation of the book:  We do not have an overall view of the relationship between Compliance and the rights of the defence in the continuum of internal investigations and DPA, or in the French legal system the convention judiciaire d’intĂ©rĂŞt public (CJIP) and the comparution immĂ©diate avec reconnaissance de culpabilitĂ© (CRPC), in particular because the texts, whether hard law or soft law, decisions and academic analyses segment them, making it difficult to build a pertinent appreciation of each one. This is made all the more difficult by the fact that we know little about how each of them is applied in practice, both within each of them and in relation to each other.  As a result, it is difficult to express overall satisfaction, or total rejection, or to suggest some specific reforms and to precise on what points, to identify the appropriate source of these improvements, legislation, case law, professions, or spontaneous ways of doing. The first ambition of this book is therefore to restore an overall vision, because this is the vision of practice. If shortcomings are found to exist, then they can be more easily denounced.

However, some of the situations described may be described as flawed, or even dramatic, by some, while others may consider that they should be approved as they stand. This applies, for example, to the question of whether or not the investigation report should be secret from the prosecuting authority, which may propose a DPA (or in the French legal system a CJIP), whether or not this CJIP should be extended to individuals, whether or not a lawyer should be present from the internal investigation stage onwards, whether or not the lawyer should support the interests of the company he/she is investigating and continue to do so before the regulator or the prosecutor, whether or not the investigation is delegated from the public authorities to the company, whether or not the lawyer-investigator and then the lawyer-defendant are both lawyers, whether or not the victims are represented in the the CIPC process, etc. Depending on what one thinks the relation between Compliance and due process should be in principle and in practice, one expresses a more or less approving or severe judgement on the state of the texts, the soft law nature of most of them making the exercise complicated, and then if there is a gap between them and what one thinks should be the right standard, one asserts that in practice things happen differently from what the texts say, or one considers that the texts should be changed. From point to point, a veritable kaleidoscope emerges in this book.

Indeed, the result is a series of contributions that sometimes clash with one another, with a sort of contradictionary principle creeping into the very structure of this book, thus establishing the readesr as a sort of judges themselves , that character who is so absent. He/she will be able to do so, since the book lists texts, describes practices and gives an illustration of everything that can be thought of, in visions that are sometimes analytical and sometimes global, with proposals of reforms of texts, jurisprudence or conduct.

The aim of the book is to enable readers to form their own opinions and to take part in what is undoubtedly being strongly debated today: the confrontation between Compliance and rights of the defence.

____

đź§®this book follows a conference organised by the Conseil national des barreaux – CNB (French National Council of Lawyers), which took place on 20 and 21 April 2023: Avocats et droits de la dĂ©fense dans les enquĂŞtes internes et la justice nĂ©gociĂ©e.

____

This volume is the continuation of the books dedicated to Compliance in this collection.

â–ş Read the presentations of the other books in the series:

  • the following books:

🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕L’Obligation de Compliance, 2025

🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕Compliance et Contrat, forthcoming

🕴️L. Laref (ed.), 📕Compliance et vigilance bancaire, forthcoming

🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📕Le système juridique de l’adressage de l’Internet. Une structure multi-acteurs, gage de durabilité (The Legal System of Internet Addressing. A Multi-Stakeholder Structure, the Pledge of its Sustainability), forthcoming

🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕Le système probatoire de la Compliance, forthcoming

 

  • the previous books:

🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance, 2023

🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕Les Buts Monumentaux de la Compliance, 2022

🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕Les outils de la Compliance, 2021

🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕Pour une Europe de la Compliance, 2019

🕴️N. Borga, J.-Cl. Marin and J.-Ch. Roda (eds.), 📕Compliance : l’entreprise, le régulateur et le juge, 2018

🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕Régulation, Supervision, Compliance, 2017

🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📕Internet, espace d’interrégulation, 2016

📚Read the presentations of the other titles of the collection.

____

â–ş Summary of the book: The rights of the defence are one of the pillars of our Rule of Law. On the face of it, compliance techniques are not concerned with this under the pretext of efficiency. This would be particularly true in a trilogy that unfolds over time: internal investigation, convention judiciaire d’intĂ©rĂŞt public – CJIP (French Judicial Public Interest Agreement) and comparution sur reconnaissance prĂ©alable de culpabilitĂ© – CRPC (French guilty plea procedure).

However, because Compliance Law is also the expression of the Rule of Law, in that its ambition is to detect and prevent systemic risks in order to protect present and future human beings, we must go beyond this opposition and articulate Compliance and rights of the defence.

The Monumental Goals of Compliance, which justify its power, for example to obtain information, and the fundamental rights of the defence, which for example impose the presumption of innocence, must be adjusted to each other; by interpreting texts, or even adopting new ones.

The book analyses each of these three techniques, in particular the still largely unregulated internal investigation, and sheds light on them in relation to each other, in order to formulate proposals.

____

🏗️General construction of the book: The book opens with an overview divided into three sections. The first Title compares the challenges of the internal investigation with the rights of the defence. The second Title compares the issues at stake in the convention judiciaire d’intĂ©rĂŞt public – CJIP (French Judicial Public Interest Agreement) and the comparution sur reconnaissance prĂ©alable de culpabilitĂ© – CRPC (French guilty plea procedure) with these same rights of the defence.

____

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

COMPLIANCE ET DROITS DE LA DÉFENSE : VISION D’ENSEMBLE

(COMPLIANCE AND RIGHTS OF THE DEFENCE : OVERVIEW)

Section 1 â™¦ď¸Ź ConnaĂ®tre les pratiques pour redessiner les frontières et accroĂ®tre les points de contact entre Compliance et droits de la dĂ©fense dans l’enquĂŞte interne, la CJIP et la CRPC. Lignes de force de l’ouvrage Compliance et droits de la dĂ©fense (Understanding practices to redraw the boundaries and increase the points of contact between Compliance and the rights of the defense in internal investigation, French Judicial Public Interest Agreement and French guilty plea procedure. Main Aspects of the Book Compliance and rights of the defence), by🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche  

Section 2 â™¦ď¸Ź  Compliance et droits de la dĂ©fense : toujours pour le respect des droits humains (Compliance and rights of the defence: always for the respect of human rights), by🕴️Matthieu Boissavy

Section 3 â™¦ď¸Ź Circuler dans le temps pour mettre en phase Compliance et droits de la dĂ©fense (Moving through Time to align Compliance and rights of the defence), by🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche

 

TITRE I. 

LES ENJEUX PROCÉDURAUX DE L’ENQUETE INTERNE CONFRONTÉE AUX DROITS DE LA DÉFENSE

(TITLE I. 

PROCEDURAL CHALLENGES OF THE INTERNAL INVESTIGATION

IN RELATION TO THE RIGHTS OF THE DEFENCE)

 

CHAPITRE I : VISION GÉNÉRALE DES DROITS DE LA DÉFENSE DANS L’ENQUĂŠTE INTERNE 

(CHAPTER I: OVERVIEW OF THE RIGHTS OF THE DEFENCE IN INTERNAL INVESTIGATION)

Section 1 â™¦ď¸Ź Approche doctrinale de l’enquĂŞte interne et de l’enquĂŞte pĂ©nale privĂ©e (Doctrinal approach to internal investigation and private criminal investigation), by đź•´ď¸ŹBenjamin Fiorini

Section 2 â™¦ď¸Ź Regard critique : La place des droits de la dĂ©fense dans l’enquĂŞte interne selon le guide AFA/PNF (A critical look: The place of the rights of the defence in the internal investigation according to the AFA/PNF Guide), by đź•´ď¸ŹMargaux Durand-Poincloux, đź•´ď¸ŹDavid Apelbaum and đź•´ď¸ŹPaola Sardi-Antasan

Section 3 â™¦ď¸Ź Les conditions de rĂ©ussite de l’enquĂŞte interne dans les rapports entre le Parquet national financier et l’entreprise mise en cause â€“ l’enquĂŞte interne au soutien de la dĂ©fense de l’entreprise (The conditions for a successful internal investigation in the relationship between the French Financial Public Prosecutor’s Office and the accused company – the internal investigation in support of the company’s defence), by🕴️Jean-François Bohnert

 

CHAPITRE II : LES DROITS DE LA DÉFENSE Ă€ CHAQUE ÉTAPE DE L’ENQUĂŠTE INTERNE

(CHAPTER II: THE RIGHTS OF THE DEFENCE AT EACH STAGE OF THE INTERNAL INVESTIGATION)

 

Section 1 â™¦ď¸Ź La rĂ©ception des alertes par l’avocat (Reception of alerts by the lawyer), by🕴️Maria Lancri

Section 2 â™¦ď¸Ź Collecte et traitement des informations dans les enquĂŞtes internes Ă  l’ère numĂ©rique : processus et enjeux (Collecting and processing information for internal investigations in the digital age: processes and challenges), by🕴️Uriel Goldberg

Section 3 â™¦ď¸Ź L’apport de la psychologie pour l’effectivitĂ© des droits de la dĂ©fense dans l’enquĂŞte interne pour harcèlement au travail (The contribution of psychology to the effectiveness of the rights of the defence in internal investigation for harassment in the workplace), by🕴️Nathalie Leroy & đź•´ď¸ŹDanièle Zucker

Section 4 â™¦ď¸Ź Le respect des droits de la dĂ©fense lors des auditions des enquĂŞtes internes : un gage d’efficacitĂ© (Respecting the rights of the defence during hearings in internal investigations: a guarantee of efficacy), by đź•´ď¸ŹEmmanuel Daoud & đź•´ď¸ŹGhita Khalid Rouissi

Section 5 â™¦ď¸Ź L’enquĂŞte interne au cĹ“ur des enjeux de conformitĂ© et de justice nĂ©gociĂ©e : analyse de la position de l’AFA et du PNF (The internal investigation at the heart of conformity and negotiated justice issues: analysis of the position of the AFA and the PNF), by🕴️Éric Russo

Section 6 â™¦ď¸Ź Le rapport d’enquĂŞte interne Ă  l’épreuve des droits de la dĂ©fense (The internal investigation report put to the test of defence rights), by🕴️Samuel Sauphanor

 

CHAPITRE III : LA SPÉCIFICITÉ DES ENQUĂŠTES INTERNES DANS LES ENTREPRISES INTERNATIONALES ET LA PLACE DES DROITS DE LA DÉFENSE

(CHAPTER III : SPECIFICITY OF INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL COMPANIES AND THE PLACE OF THE RIGHTS OF THE DEFENCE)

Section 1 â™¦ď¸Ź La spĂ©cificitĂ© des enquĂŞtes internes pratiquĂ©es par les groupes internationaux (Specificity of internal investigations carried out by international groups), by đź•´ď¸ŹOlivier Catherine

Section 2 â™¦ď¸Ź Garantir la valeur probatoire d’un rapport dans le cadre d’une enquĂŞte interne opĂ©rĂ©e dans une entreprise internationale (Guaranteeing the evidential value of a report in an internal investigation carried out in an international company), by đź•´ď¸ŹMonique Figueiredo

Section 3 â™¦ď¸Ź La responsabilitĂ© de l’entreprise dans la conception et la menĂ©e de l’enquĂŞte interne (The company’s responsibility in designing and conducting an internal investigation), by đź•´ď¸ŹLydia Meziani

Section 4 â™¦ď¸Ź EnquĂŞtes internes, enquĂŞtes pĂ©nales et droits de la dĂ©fense : que nous disent les jurisprudences amĂ©ricaine et anglaise (l’affaire Connolly et l’affaire ENRC) ? (Internal investigations, criminal investigations and rights of the defence: what do the US and UK case law tell us (the Connolly case and the ENRC case)?), by đź•´ď¸ŹVictoire Chatelin

 

CHAPITRE IV : LE RĂ”LE SINGULIER DE L’AVOCAT DANS L’ENQUĂŠTE INTERNE

(CHAPTER IV: THE SPECIAL ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN THE INTERNAL INVESTIGATION)

Section 1 â™¦ď¸Ź La mĂ©thodologie propre Ă  l’avocat enquĂŞteur (The investigating lawyer’s own methodology), by đź•´ď¸ŹWilliam Feugère

Section 2 â™¦ď¸Ź L’enquĂŞte interne façonnĂ©e par la dĂ©ontologie de l’avocat (The internal investigation shaped by the lawyer’s deontology), by đź•´ď¸ŹStĂ©phane De Navacelle, 🕴️Julie Zorrila and 🕴️Laura Ragazzi

Section 3 â™¦ď¸Ź PrĂ©server le secret professionnel de l’avocat dans l’enquĂŞte interne et son rĂ©sultat (Preserving the lawyer’s professional secrecy in the internal investigation and its outcome), by đź•´ď¸ŹBĂ©nĂ©dicte Graulle & đź•´ď¸ŹYanis Rahim

Section 4 â™¦ď¸Ź L’avocat-enquĂŞteur en droit du travail : un jansĂ©niste au milieu du Far West (The lawyer-investigator in employment law: a Jansenist in the Wild West), by đź•´ď¸ŹRichard Doudet

Section 5 â™¦ď¸Ź La dĂ©fense des personnes physiques dans les enquĂŞtes internes (Defending individuals in internal investigations), by đź•´ď¸ŹDorothĂ©e Hever

 

 

TITRE II.

LES ENJEUX PROCÉDURAUX DE LA CJIP ET DE LA CRPC

CONFRONTÉES AUX DROITS DE LA DÉFENSE

(TITLE II.

PROCEDURAL CHALLENGES OF THE FRENCH JUDICIAL PUBLIC INTEREST AGREEMENT

AND THE FRENCH GUILTY PLEA PROCEDURE 

IN RELATION TO THE RIGHTS OF THE DEFENCE)

 

CHAPITRE I : VISION GÉNÉRALE DES DROITS DE LA DÉFENSE DANS LA CJIP ET LA CRPC

(CHAPTER I: OVERVIEW OF THE RIGHTS OF THE DEFENCE IN THE FRENCH JUDICIAL PUBLIC INTEREST AGREEMENT AND THE FRENCH GUILTY PLEA PROCEDURE)

Section 1 â™¦ď¸Ź ThĂ©orie et pratique de la nĂ©gociation dans la justice pĂ©nale (Theory and practice of negotiation in criminal justice), by đź•´ď¸ŹSarah-Marie Cabon

Section 2 â™¦ď¸Ź La lutte anti-corruption : l’emprunt au modèle amĂ©ricain et Ă  ses rĂ©centes Ă©volutions (The fight against corruption: borrowing from the American model and its recent developments), by đź•´ď¸ŹStephen L. Dreyfuss

Section 3 â™¦ď¸Ź Justice pĂ©nale nĂ©gociĂ©e : avantages prĂ©sents, risques Ă  venir (Negotiated criminal justice: curent benefits, future risks), by đź•´ď¸ŹAlexis Bavitot

 

CHAPITRE II : FORMES ACTIVES DES DROITS DE LA DÉFENSE, LES DIALOGUES Ă€ L’OEUVRE OU Ă€ PARFAIRE DANS LA CJIP ET LA CRPC

(CHAPTER II: ACTIVE FORMS OF THE RIGHTS OF THE DEFENCE, DIALOGUES AT WORK OR TO BE PERFECTED IN THE FRENCH JUDICIAL PUBLIC INTEREST AGREEMENT AND THE FRENCH GUILTY PLEA PROCEDURE)

Section 1 â™¦ď¸Ź Combinaison des CRPC et des CJIP : le cas particulier des affaires de fraude fiscale (Combination of the French guilty plea procedure and the French Judicial Public Interest Agreement: the special issue of tax fraud cases), by đź•´ď¸ŹMarion David

Section 2 â™¦ď¸Ź Pour une justice pĂ©nale nĂ©gociĂ©e plus Ă©quitable (For a fairer negotiated criminal justice), by🕴️Astrid Mignon Colombet

Section 3 â™¦ď¸Ź Les impacts, sur les droits de la dĂ©fense, des disparitĂ©s de la justice pĂ©nale nĂ©gociĂ©e dans l’Union europĂ©enne (The impact on the rights of the defence of the disparities in negotiated criminal justice in the European Union), by đź•´ď¸ŹEmmanuel Moyne

Section 4 â™¦ď¸Ź L’Ă©volution des rapports entre avocats et autoritĂ©s de poursuites depuis l’introduction de la CJIP (Developments in relations between lawyers and prosecuting authorities since the introduction of the French Judicial Public Interest Agreement), by đź•´ď¸ŹThomas Baudesson

 

CHAPITRE III : LE RĂ”LE SINGULIER DE L’AVOCAT DANS LA CJIP ET LA CRPC 

(CHAPTER III: THE SINGULAR ROLE OF THE LAWYER IN THE FRENCH JUDICIAL PUBLIC INTEREST AGREEMENT AND THE FRENCH GUILTY PLEA PROCEDURE)

Section 1 â™¦ď¸Ź Quand se justifie et quand s’arrĂŞte la collaboration ? Ă€ propos de la CJIP (When is collaboration justified and when does it end? About the French Judicial Public Interest Agreement), by đź•´ď¸ŹPhilippe Goossens

Section 2 â™¦ď¸Ź Le dialogue de l’avocat et de son client, chef d’entreprise, face Ă  la proposition d’une CRPC et d’une CJIP (The dialogue between the lawyer and his client, a company director, faced with the proposal of a French guilty plea procedure or a French Judicial Public Interest Agreement), by đź•´ď¸ŹFrançois Saint-Pierre

Section 3 â™¦ď¸Ź Le dilemme de l’avocat pĂ©naliste face Ă  la CRPC (The criminal lawyer’s dilemma when faced with the French guilty plea procedure), by đź•´ď¸ŹJean Boudot

Section 5 â™¦ď¸Ź DĂ©fendre les intĂ©rĂŞts des victimes dans la justice pĂ©nale Ă©conomique nĂ©gociĂ©e (Defending victims’ interests in negotiated economic criminal justice), by đź•´ď¸ŹJĂ©rĂ´me Karsenti

________

LinkedIn follow Marie-Anne Frison-Roche on LinkedIn

Instagram follow Marie-Anne Frison-Roche on Instagram

LinkedIn subscribe to the Newsletter MAFR Regulation, Compliance, Law