Direction de la collection « Compliance & Regulation », JoRC et Bruylant

Direction de publication

🏗️ coédition et direction de collection : 📘Compliance & Regulation

📚À paraître : 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📘The Legal System of Internet Addressing. A Multi-Stakeholder Structure, the Pledge of its Sustainability

► Référence complète : M.-A. Frison-Roche, The Legal System of Internet Addressing. A Multi-Stakeholder Structure, the Pledge of its Sustainability, Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Lefebvre-Bruylant, coll. « Compliance & Regulation », à paraître. - 📕 Cet ouvrage paraît en anglais. Il paraît également en français, dans la collection « Régulations & Compliance » : Le système juridique de l’adressage de l’Internet. Une structure multi-acteurs, gage de durabilité, Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Lefebvre-Dalloz, à paraître. - ► Lire les présentations des autres ouvrages de la collection « Compliance & Regulation » - ► Présentation générale de l’ouvrage : Internet est un espace qui repose sur un système technique constitué par les adresses IP, qui sont toutes joignables entre elles. Ce principe technique simple est essentiel car c’est sur lui que repose l’espace numérique, en ce que celui-ci permet à quiconque d’y pénétrer, d’y circuler et d’y atteindre les autres. C’est ce principe de l’Internet ouvert qui a permis la construction de l’espace numérique dans lequel nous vivons. Ce système technique des adresses IP a été rendu aisément maniable par les noms de domaine. Cette maniabilité des adresses IP a rendu effectif le caractère ouvert de l’Internet et a permis l’extension d’un espace qui a été dès l’origine global, base de l’espace numérique. Ces éléments techniques ont été directement traduits dans le système de l’adressage par les noms de domaine, qui a été bâti par le Droit. Le système juridique de l’adressage qui en résulte est le reflet de cette base technique et nul ne peut ni nier ni défaire ce lien : en effet, le Droit permet à l’infrastructure des noms de domaine de fonctionner effectivement à l’échelle globale et d’une façon ouverte, où chacun peut joindre l’autre. Architecture technique et architecture juridique sont ainsi indissociables. Cette liberté pour chacun de créer et de circuler dans l’espace numérique est permise par la technique et garantie par l’organisation juridique de l’architecture des noms de domaine. La présente étude est construite en deux parties. La première partie vise à décrire l’organisation juridique du système mondial des noms de domaine. La seconde partie examine comment améliorer ce système. Elle étudie d’abord les effets techniques qui seraient produits par la réalisation de scenarii de changement du système juridique de l’adressage, à savoir un risque élevé de capture et/ou une fragmentation par zone régionale du système des noms de domaine. En effet, si l’organisation juridique du système global des noms de domaine était significativement modifiée, notamment par la constitution de zones juridiques d’adressage autonomes les unes des autres, l’impératif technique de globalité demeurant intact et premier, l’interconnexion entre les différentes zones s’imposerait et serait alors assurée par un acteur public ou privé qui pourrait ainsi s’emparer de fait du contrôle du système technique via ces nouvelles organisations juridiques du système ainsi proposées, opérant la capture de l’ensemble. Elle vise ensuite à montrer que si le système juridique doit rester en l’état, parce que le système technique dont il est le reflet doit lui-même rester en l’état, l’on peut observer que sa contestation peut être le résultat de stratégies de capture, mais aussi de contestations qui résultent d’une incompréhension du système juridique. Alors que des mécanismes de transparence et de reddition des comptes sont omniprésents. L’on constate qu’il est souvent peu compris, notamment par le monde des juristes, ce qui constitue une fragilité, à laquelle il serait pertinent de remédier. Cette complexité est le reflet d’une part de la technique elle-même et d’autre part de l’absence structurelle de capture : l’on ne peut donc y renoncer. La transparence de droit organisée ne met de fait pas fin à cette incompréhension, parce que celle-ci a pour cause la complexité des règles juridiques d’organisation et de fonctionnement. Il convient donc d’expliquer à l’égard des différents auditoires pourquoi ce système juridique-là s’impose et pas un autre. Cette charge pèse sur les opérateurs cruciaux du système juridique de l’adressage. Elle doit avoir pour bénéficiaires les différents cercles d’auditoires. Elle produira une sécurité juridique accrue pour un système dont la légitimité et la légalité ne sont pas par ailleurs entamées, mais n’être pas facilement compréhensible est, dans un monde où toute organisation est juridiquement contestable, une faiblesse juridique. C’est à cela qu’il faut remédier. - PROVISIONAL TABLE OF CONTENTS   In Perspective   PART ONE HOW THE GLOBAL LEGAL SYSTEM OF NAMING IS BUILT   CHAPTER I: ICANN: A LEGAL STRUCTURE OF CLASSIC HARD-LAW FORM, REQUIRED BY THE TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE ADDRESSING SYSTEM, TRANSPOSED THROUGH STATUTES THAT SEPARATE THE POWER TO PROPOSE FROM THE POWER TO ADOPT IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH A “MULTI-STAKEHOLDER” SYSTEM WHOSE PURPOSE AND EFFECT ARE TO PREVENT CAPTURE CHAPTER II: THE EXERCISE BY STATES OF THEIR PREROGATIVES THROUGH NATIONAL PUBLIC LAWS: ARTICULATION BETWEEN THE TWO GEOGRAPHICAL SPACES OF HARD LAW CHAPTER III: INTERNATIONAL SPACES OF HARD AND SOFT LAW: UN, WIPO, ITU, WSIS CHAPTER IV: MIRRORING THE TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE ADDRESSING SYSTEM, THE INTERMESHED GLOBAL LEGAL STRUCTURE, ARTICULATING THE SPACE OF HARD LAW AND THE SPACE OF SOFT LAW CHAPTER V: INTERNALISATION WITHIN CRUCIAL OPERATORS THROUGH COMPLIANCE TECHNIQUES LINKED TO THE OBLIGATION OF SUSTAINABILITY   PART TWO HOW TO IMPROVE THE GLOBAL LEGAL SYSTEM OF NAMING   CHAPTER I: ASSESSMENT OF THE RADICAL TECHNICAL TRANSFORMATIONS THAT PROPOSALS TO CHANGE THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ADDRESSING COULD BRING ABOUT Section 1 ♦️ Assessment of the technical consequences of the legal proposal to transfer the current complex and specific system into an ordinary mechanism of Public International Law Section 2 ♦️ Assessment of the technical consequences of the indirect proposal to establish separate blocks of systems by zone CHAPTER II: MAINTAINING THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ADDRESSING, GLOBAL, PROTECTED FROM CAPTURE AND ABLE TO ENSURE TECHNICAL SUSTAINABILITY? BY FOSTERING AN INCREMENTAL PROCEDURAL IMPROVEMENT TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING AND THUS BETTER ACCOUNTABILITY Section 1 ♦️ A grievance, factual but central: the legal system of domain names is hard to understand. Causes and consequences Section 2 ♦️ Making the legal system of domain names more easily understandable to the parties concerned Ex Ante Section 3 ♦️ Explaining clearly, starting from the purposes, the share of technical sustainability and the share of societal sustainability, the former firmly preserved, the latter handled as a debated project Section 4 ♦️ Enhancing soft-law instruments for their discursive, that is explanatory, scope regarding the domain name system within the global governance of the Internet Section 5 ♦️ Making the legal system of domain names understandable to the parties concerned Ex Post: thereby increasing the value of accountability   Selected Bibliographical Sources Index
Couverture – Compliance Obligation

Direction de publication

🏗️ coédition et direction de collection : 📚Compliance & Regulation

📚Parution de : 🕴️ M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📘Compliance Obligation

► Référence complète : M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), Compliance Obligation, Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Bruylant, coll. "Compliance & Regulation", 2026. - 📕En parallèle, un livre en français, L'Obligation de Compliance, a étépublié dans la collection "Régulations & Compliance" copubliée par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Dalloz.  - 📚Ce livre est partie intégrante de cette collection créée Marie-Anne Frison-Roche pour développer le Droit de la Compliance et de la Régulation.  lire la présentation des autres ouvrages de la collection : livres ultérieurs : 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📘Compliance Evidential System, 2027 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📘Compliance and Contrat, 2027 livres précédents : ​🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed), 📘Compliance Juridictionnalisation, 2023 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed), 📘Compliance Monumental Goals, 2022 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), 📘Compliance Tools, 2021 - ►  voir la présentation générale de cette 📚Series ​Compliance & Regulation, conçue, fondée et dirigée par Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, copubliée par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Bruylant.  - 🧮ce livre suit le cycle de colloques 2023 organisé par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et ses Universités partenaires. - ► présentation générale du livre : Compliance is sometimes presented as something that cannot be avoided, which is tantamount to seeing it as the legal obligation par excellence, Criminal Law being its most appropriate mode of expression. However, this is not so evident. Moreover, it is becoming difficult to find a unity to the set of compliance tools, encompassing what refers to a moral representation of the world, or even to the cultures specific to each company, Compliance Law only having to produce incentives or translate this ethical movement. The obligation of compliance is therefore difficult to define. This difficulty to define affecting the obligation of compliance reflects the uncertainty that still affects Compliance Law in which this obligation develops. Indeed, if we were to limit this branch of law to the obligation to « be conform » with the applicable regulations, the obligation would then be located more in these « regulations », the classical branches of Law which are Contract Law and Tort Law organising « Obligations » paradoxically remaining distant from it. In practice, however, it is on the one hand Liability actions that give life to legal requirements, while companies make themselves responsible through commitments, often unilateral, while contracts multiply, the articulation between legal requirements and corporate and contractual organisations ultimately creating a new way of « governing » not only companies but also what is external to them, so that the Monumental Goals, that Compliance Law substantially aims at, are achieved.  The various Compliance Tools illustrate this spectrum of the Compliance Obligation which varies in its intensity and takes many forms, either as an extension of the classic legal instruments, as in the field of information, or in a more novel way through specific instruments, such as whistleblowing or vigilance. The contract, in that it is by nature an Ex-Ante instrument and not very constrained by borders, can then appear as a natural instrument in the compliance system, as is the Judge who is the guarantor of the proper execution of Contract and Tort laws. The relationship between companies, stakeholders and political authorities is thus renewed. - 🏗️general construction of the book The book opens with a substantial Introduction, putting the different sort of obligations of compliance in legal categories for showing that companies must build structures of compliance (obligation of result) and act to contribute with states and stakeholders to reach Monumental Goals (obligation of means).  The first part is devoted to the definition of the Compliance Obligation.  The second part presents the articulation of Compliance obligation with the other branchs of Law, because the specific obligation is built by Compliance Law, as new substantial branch of Law but also by many other branchs of Law. The third part develops the pratical means established to obtained the Compliance Obligation to be effective, efficace and efficient. The fourth part takes the Obligation  of Vigilance as an illustration of all these considerations and the discussion about the future of this sparehead fo the Compliance Obligation .  The fifth part refers to the place and the role of the judges, natural characters for any obligation.  - TABLE OF CONTENTS    ANCHORING THE SO DIVERSE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATIONS IN THEIR NATURE, REGIMES AND FORCE TO BRING OUT THE VERY UNITY OF THE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION, MAKING IT COMPREHENSIBLE AND PRACTICABLE    🔹 Compliance Obligation: building a compliance structure that produces credible results withe regard to the Monumentals Goals targeted by the Legislator, by 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche   TITLE I. IDENTIFYING THE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION   CHAPTER I: NATURE OF THE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION Section 1 🔹 Will, Heart and Calculation, the three marks surrounding the Compliance Obligation, by 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Section 2 🔹 Debt, as the basis of the compliance obligation, by 🕴️Bruno Deffains Section 3 🔹 Compliance Obligation and Human Rights, by 🕴️Jean-Baptiste Racine Section 4 🔹 Compliance Obligation and changes in Sovereignty and Citizenship, by 🕴️René Sève Section 5 🔹 The definition of the Compliance Obligation in Cybersecurity, by 🕴️Michel Séjean   CHAPTER II: SPACES OF THE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION Section 1 🔹 Industrial Entities and Compliance Obligation, by 🕴️Etienne Maclouf Section 2 🔹 Compliance, Value Chains and Service Economy, by 🕴️Lucien Rapp Section 3 🔹 Compliance and conflict of laws. International Law of Vigilance-Conformity, based on applications in Europe, by 🕴️Louis d'Avout    TITLE II. ARTICULATING THE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION WITH OTHER BRANCHES OF LAW   Section 1 🔹 Tax Law and Compliance Obligation, by 🕴️Daniel Gutmann Section 2 🔹 General Procedural Law, prototype of the Compliance Obligation, by 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Section 3 🔹 Corporate and Financial Markets Law facing the Compliance Obligation, by 🕴️Anne-Valérie Le Fur Section 4 🔹 Transformation of Governance and Vigilance Obligation, by 🕴️Véronique Magnier Section 5 🔹 The Relation between Tort Law and Compliance Obligation, by 🕴️Jean-Sébastien Borghetti Section 6 🔹 Environmental and Climate Compliance, by 🕴️Marta Torre-Schaub Section 7 🔹 Competition Law and Compliance Law, by 🕴️Jean-Christophe Roda Section 8 🔹 The Compliance Obligation in Global Law, by 🕴️Benoît Frydman & 🕴️Alice Briegleb Section 9 🔹 Environmental an Climatic Dimensions of the Compliance Obligation, by 🕴️Marta Torre-Schaub Section 10 🔹 Judge of Insolvency Law and Compliance Obligations, by 🕴️Jean-Baptiste Barbièri   TITLE III. COMPLIANCE: GIVE AND TAKE THE MEANS TO OBLIGE   CHAPTER I: COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION: THE CONVERGENCE OF SOURCES Section 1 🔹 Compliance Obligation upon Obligation works, by 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Section 2 🔹 Conformity technologies to meet Compliance Law requirements. Some examples in Digital Law, by 🕴️Emmanuel Netter Section 3 🔹 Legal Constraint and Company Strategies in Compliance matters, by 🕴️Jean-Philippe Denis & 🕴️Nathalie Fabbe-Coste Section 4 🔹 Opposition and convergence of American and European legal systems in Compliance Rules and Systems, by 🕴️Raphaël Gauvain & 🕴️Blanche Balian Section 5 🔹 In Compliance Law, the legal consequences for Entreprises of their Commitments and Undertakings, by 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche   CHAPTER II: INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN SUPPORT OF THE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION Section 1 🔹 How International Arbitration can reinforce the Compliance Obligation, by  🕴️Laurent Aynès Section 2 🔹 Arbitration consideration of Compliance Obligation for a Sustainable Arbitration Place, by 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Section 3 🔹 The Arbitral Tribunal's Award in Kind, in support of the Compliance Obligation, by 🕴️Eduardo Silva Romero Section 4 🔹 The use of International Arbitration to reinforce the Compliance Obligation: the example of the construction sector, by 🕴️Christophe Lapp  Section 5 🔹 The Arbitrator, Judge, Supervisor, Support, by 🕴️Jean-Baptiste Racine   TITLE IV. VIGILANCE, SPEARHEAD OF THE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION Section 1 🔹 Vigilance Obligation, Spearheard and Total Share of the Compliance Obligation, by 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche   CHAPTER I: INTENSITIES OF THE VIGILANCE OBLIGATION, SPEARHEAD OF THE COMPLIANCE SYSTEM Section 2 🔹 Intensity of the Vigilance Obligation by Sectors: the case of Financial Operators, by 🕴️Anne-Claire Rouaud Section 3 🔹 Intensity of the Vigilance Obligation by Sectors: the case of Digital Operators, by 🕴️Grégoire Loiseau Section 4 🔹 Intensity of the Vigilance Obligation by Sectors: the case of Energy Operators, by 🕴️Marie Lamoureux   CHAPTER II: GENERAL EVOLUTION OF THE VIGILANCE OBLIGATION Section 1 🔹 Rethinking the Concept of Civil Liability in the light of the Duty of Vigilance, Spearhead of Compliance, by 🕴️Mustapha Mekki Section 2 🔹 Contracts and clauses, implementation and modalities of the Vigilance Obligation, by 🕴️Gilles J. Martin Section 3 🔹 Proof that Vigilance has been properly carried out with regard to the Compliance Evidence System, by 🕴️Jean-Christophe Roda Section 4 🔹 Compliance, Vigilance and Civil Liability: put in order and keep the Reason, by 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche   Title V. THE JUDGE AND THE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION Section 1 🔹 Present and Future Challenges of Articulating Principles of Civil and Commercial Procedure with the Logic of Compliance, by 🕴️Thibault Goujon-Bethan Section 2 🔹 The Judge required for an Effective Compliance Obligation, by 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche - CONCLUSION THE COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION: A BURDEN BORNE BY SYSTEMIC COMPANIES GIVING LIFE TO COMPLIANCE LAW   (conclusion and key points of the books, free access)

Direction de publication

🏗️ coédition et direction de collection : 📚Compliance & Regulation

📚Parution de : 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), 📘Compliance and Contract

► Référence complète : M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), Compliance and Contract, Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Bruylant, coll. « Compliance & Regulation« , à paraître - 📕Parallèlement, un ouvrage en français, Compliance et contrat, est publié dans la collection coéditée par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Dalloz - 🧮Cet ouvrage vient à la suite d’un cycle de colloques 2026, organisés par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et des Universités qui lui sont partenaires - ► Présentation générale de l’ouvrage : Cette part est sous-estimée parce que le Droit de la Compliance est souvent analysé à travers les lois et réglementations élaborées pour atteindre des Buts Monumentaux de nature politique imposés par les États et les autorités publiques, à la concrétisation desquels les opérateurs économiques systémiques contribuent par des Outils de Compliance, et non pas par la volonté libre des opérateurs eux-mêmes. Lorsqu’ils agissent librement, cela est souvent alors renvoyé hors du Droit généralement l’éthique (créant l’ambiguité des « engagements »). Mais à l’avenir le contrat, instrument juridique Ex Ante contraignant par excellence, va prendre une part grandissante au sein des systèmes globaux et intermaillés de Compliance. Notamment dans la construction européenne du Droit de la Compliance, qui met les êtres humains au centre du souci de durabilité des systèmes, le contrat apparaît ainsi à la fois comme la modalité par laquelle l’entreprise assujettie exécute son obligation légale de contribuer aux Buts Monumentaux de la Compliance, tisse des relations avec d’autres acteurs et déploie les innovations requises, mais encore exerce l’autonomie de sa volonté pour contribuer à la concrétisation des ambitions systèmiques en cause, peut dépasser les ambitions publiques, les enrichit, les ancre territorialement, les identifie à sa propre activité et à sa stratégie globale d’entreprise, etc. Pour décrire et anticiper la pratique et les règles qui articulent le Droit de la Compliance et le Contrat, l’ouvrage examine tout d’abord en quoi cette nouvelle branche du Droit, en tant qu’elle reprend les idées politiques du Contrat social, renouvelle le droit des contrats en l’instaurant dans la stratégie globale des opérateurs économiques dans les groupes sociaux, ce qu’ils font d’autant plus aisément qu’ils ont construit par des contrats les chaines de valeur internationales. Ces contrats qui bâtissent les chaines de valeur sont des « contrats de régulation ». Cela montre que les contrats de droit public sont exemplaires de l’accueil par le Droit des contrats de la perspective globale de la compliance, normativement ancrée dans les Buts Monumentaux (Titre I). Cela posé, l’ouvrage mesure la façon dont le droit commun des contrats s’articule avec les techniques et les objectifs du Droit de la Compliance. D’une façon impérieuse, ou incitative, ou d’appui, celui-ci pénètre dans les contrats, pour les écrire en partie, qu’il s’agisse de contrats se développant dans des activités régulées ou pas, les points de contact avec le principe du libéralisme, et les limites à celui-ci, étant alors établis par le Juge. Mais en retour, le droit commun des contrats engendre des apports au Droit de la compliance et le fera de plus en plus. Aussi bien au stade de la formation, de l’exécution, et des sanctions qui peuvent être consolidations (Titre II). Concrètement, le contrat apparaît lui-même comme un outil de compliance. À ce titre, l’entreprise peut choisir d’externaliser la fonction de compliance, ce qu’elle a la liberté de faire dès l’instant qu’elle demeure comptable de l’exécution à l’égard du législateur et des personnes concernées : c’est l’hypothèse du « Contrat de Compliance », qui apparaît comme un contrat à part entière. Par ailleurs, la Compliance peut être insérée dans de multiples contrats, dispositifs contractuels par lesquels les contractants organisent une ou des obligations qui vont faciliter ou accroître leur obligation légale. Ce faisant, les sujets de droit exercent leur liberté, ce que le droit commun permet, ce que l’on retrouve en pratique « clause après clause », et ce que le Régulateur, Superviseur et/ou Juge apprécient également au regard des finalités du Droit de la Compliance (Titre III). Précisément, est en train de naître un « contentieux contractuel de la compliance ou impliquant celle-ci ». Il s’agit tout d’abord de rendre ici compte des contentieux contractuels dans lesquels un élément de Droit de la Compliance apparaît dans le litige. En effet, la dispute autour d’une demande d’exécution ou de résolution ou de responsabilité contractuelle peut impliquer, dans la demande ou une exception ou défense articulées, un élément de Droit de la compliance, allant d’une allégation d’incompétence juridictionnelle jusqu’à une demande de prise en considération d’une finalité systémique que le juge du contrat devrait prendre en considération. En second lieu, dans certains contentieux systémique émergent de compliance, parce que l’office du juge en est transformé et que la procédure doit être adaptée, le contrat apparaît comme un outil particulièrement adapté, soit comme « figure procédurale » à travers une contractualisation de l’ensemble, soit comme technique utilisée au sens strict, sa nature Ex Ante permettant dans des litiges qui concernent le futur de produire de nouvelles techniques (Titre IV). - 📚Ce volume s’insère dans la lignée des ouvrages qui, dans cette collection en langue anglaise, sont consacrés à la Compliance. ► Lire la présentation des autres ouvrages de la Collection portant sur la Compliance : les ouvrages suivants : 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), 📘Compliance Evidence System, 2025 les ouvrages précédents : 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), 📘Compliance Obligation, 2024 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), 📘Compliance Jurisdictionalisation, 2024 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), 📘Compliance Monumental Goals, 2023 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), 📘Compliance Tools, 2021   📚Consulter les autres titres de la collection. - 🏗️Construction générale de l’ouvrage : ► Première présentation de la Table des matières provisoire  : - TABLE DES MATIÈRES PROVISOIRE REPORTING ON CONTRACTUAL PRACTICES WITHIN THE COMPLIANCE SYSTEM AND ENHANCING ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND HUMANITY ♦️ The Marriage between Compliance and Contract, par 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche TITRE I. SOCIAL CONTRACT, COMPLIANCE LAW AND THE STRATEGY OF ECONOMIC OPERATORS CHAPITRE I : SOCIAL CONTRACT AND COMPLIANCE LAW Section 1 ♦️ The Monumental Goals of Compliance, a guide to action for economic operators serving global policies, par 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Section 2 ♦️ Compliance and the Social Contract, par 🕴️René Sève CHAPITRE II : POLITICAL AMBITIONS AND CORPORATE STRATEGIES IN THE CONTRACTUAL ORGANISATION OF VALUE CHAINS Section 1 ♦️ sss Section 2 ♦️ sss, par CHAPITRE III : PUBLIC CONTRACTS, PARAGONS OF THE INCORPORATION OF POLITICAL AMBITIONS INTO STRATEGIES AND OF THE ALLIANCE OF INSTITUTIONS Section 1 ♦️ Contractual instruments facilitating the insertion of the compliance obligation, par 🕴️Marion Ubaud-Bergeron Section 2 ♦️ Third-party assessment obligations in public contracts, par 🕴️Valentin Lamy Section 3 ♦️ Exemplarity in public contracts, par 🕴️Ugo Assouad et 🕴️Léon Boijout Section 4 ♦️ Is the duty of vigilance soluble in the law of administrative contracts?, par 🕴️Antoine Oumedjkane TITRE II. GENERAL CONTRACT LAW FACED WITH COMPLIANCE LAW CHAPITRE I : DISTINGUISHING WHAT IS CONTRACTUAL FROM WHAT RESEMBLES IT IN THE COMPLIANCE SYSTEM Section 1 ♦️ Commitments, Contractualisation and Compliance, par 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Section 2 ♦️ The functional contract, the contribution of general contract law to compliance requirements, par 🕴️Laurent Aynès CHAPITRE II : WHERE GENERAL CONTRACT LAW CONTRIBUTES TO COMPLIANCE Section 1 ♦️ Regulatory contracts generated by compliance, par 🕴️Jean-Baptiste Barbieri Section 2 ♦️ Third parties to contracts that include a compliance dimension, par 🕴️Philippe Stoffel-Munck TITRE III. COMPLIANCE CONTRACT, COMPLIANCE CLAUSES CHAPITRE I : THE « COMPLIANCE CONTRACT » Sous-chapitre 1 : THE EMERGENCE OF THE « COMPLIANCE CONTRACT » AND OF THE COMPLIANCE MARKET Section 1 ♦️ The industrialisation and outsourcing by the company of an essential function through the « compliance contract », par 🕴️Étienne Maclouf et 🕴️Bruno Deffains Section 2 ♦️ Legal definition of the « compliance contract », par 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Sous-chapitre 2 : EXAMPLES OF « COMPLIANCE CONTRACTS » Section 3 ♦️ Internal investigation contracts, par 🕴️Dominique de la Garanderie Section 4 ♦️ Contracts concluded with audit firms, par 🕴️Antoinette Gutierrez-Crespin Sous-chapitre 3 : THE LAW’S RESPONSE TO THE INDUSTRIALISATION AND STANDARDISATION OF THE « COMPLIANCE CONTRACT » Section 5 ♦️ How competition law grasps the standardisation and industrialisation of the « compliance contract » in order to regulate, par 🕴️Jean-Christophe Roda Section 6 ♦️ The international aspects of the « compliance contract », par 🕴️Jean-Baptiste Racine CHAPITRE II : COMPLIANCE CLAUSES Section 1 ♦️ Uniqueness and Diversity of Compliance Clauses, par 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Section 2 ♦️ Compared usefulness of conformity clauses and Compliance clauses, par 🕴️Jean-Christophe Roda Sous-chapitre 1 : COMPLIANCE CLAUSES CONCERNING INFORMATION Section 3 ♦️ Compliance clauses relating to the transmission of information, par 🕴️Thibault Duchesne Section 4 ♦️ Compliance clauses relating to confidentiality and the non-transmission of information, par 🕴️Jean-Christophe Roda Section 5 ♦️ Compliance clauses relating to audit, par 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Sous-chapitre 2 : COMPLIANCE CLAUSES CONCERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT Section 6 ♦️ Compliance clauses relating to changes in circumstances, par 🕴️Julia Heinich Section 7 ♦️ Compliance clauses aimed at obtaining appropriate behaviour (the example of labour relations), par 🕴️Joseph-Antoine Morin Section 8 ♦️ Compliance clauses aimed at ensuring the effectiveness of risk management plans, par 🕴️Grégoire Leray Section 9 ♦️ Robustness clauses, par 🕴️Ludovic Pailler Sous-chapitre 3 : COMPLIANCE CLAUSES CONCERNING THE PREVENTION AND ANTICIPATED MANAGEMENT OF DISPUTES Section 10 ♦️ Compliance clauses relating to sanctions, par 🕴️Laura Sautonie-Laguionie Section 11 ♦️ Compliance clauses relating to remediation, par 🕴️Morgane Tirel Section 12 ♦️ Compliance clauses relating to procedure, expert evidence and pre-trial case management, par 🕴️Thibault Goujon-Béthan TITRE IV. CONTRACTUAL LITIGATION INVOLVING COMPLIANCE LAW CHAPITRE I : IDENTIFYING CONTRACTUAL LITIGATION INVOLVING COMPLIANCE Section 1 ♦️ The emergence of contractual litigation involving Compliance through the convergence of fields, par 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Section 2 ♦️ The singularity of contractual litigation involving Compliance, par 🕴️Thibault Goujon-Béthan CHAPITRE II : COURTS SEISED AND NATURAL JUDGES OF CONTRACTUAL LITIGATION INVOLVING COMPLIANCE Section 1 ♦️ Ordinary courts and specialised courts in contractual litigation involving Compliance, par 🕴️Romain Raine Section 2 ♦️ From the criminal court to the civil court in contractual litigation involving Compliance, par 🕴️Alex Nicollet Section 3 ♦️ The supporting judge in contractual litigation involving Compliance, par 🕴️Fabrice Vert Section 4 ♦️ The arbitrator in contractual litigation involving Compliance, par 🕴️Cyril Nourissat CHAPITRE III : THE PARTIES TO CONTRACTUAL LITIGATION INVOLVING COMPLIANCE Section 1 ♦️ Original and intervening parties, necessary parties, stakeholders: who are the legitimate parties?, par 🕴️Liza Veyre CHAPITRE IV : THE PROCEDURAL HANDLING OF CONTRACTUAL LITIGATION INVOLVING COMPLIANCE Section 1 ♦️ Handling time in contractual litigation involving Compliance: from urgency to the long term, par 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche Section 2 ♦️ Contractualising pre-trial case management, a natural tool of contractual litigation involving Compliance, par 🕴️Thibault Goujon-Béthan Section 3 ♦️ Contractualising evidence in contractual litigation involving Compliance, par 🕴️Nicolas Ida Section 4 ♦️ The hearing in contractual litigation involving Compliance, par 🕴️Anaïs Danet CHAPITRE V : THE JUDGMENT IN CONTRACTUAL LITIGATION INVOLVING COMPLIANCE Section 1 ♦️ The appropriate judgment in contractual litigation involving Compliance and its effective enforcement, par 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche et 🕴️Thibault Goujon-Béthan
Couverture – Compliance Jurisdictionalisation

Direction de publication

🏗️ coédition et direction de collection : 📚Compliance & Regulation

📚Parution de : 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), 📘Compliance Jurisdictionalisation

► Référence complète : M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), Compliance Jurisdictionalisation, Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Bruylant, coll. "Compliance & Regulation", 2024, 464 p. - 📕Parallèlement, un ouvrage en français, La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance, est publié dans la collection coéditée par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Dalloz.  - 🧮Cet ouvrage vient à la suite d'un cycle de colloques 2021 organisés par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et des Universités qui lui sont partenaires. - ► Présentation générale de l'ouvrage : Sanctions, controls, appeals, deals: judges and lawyers are everywhere in the Compliance mechanisms, creating unprecedented situations, sometimes without a solution yet available. Even though Compliance was designed to avoid the judge and produce security by avoiding conflict. This jurisdictionalisation is therefore new. Forcing companies to prosecute and judge, a constrained role, perhaps against their nature. Leading to the adaptation of major procedural principles, with difficulty. Confronting arbitration with new perspectives. Putting the judge at heart, in mechanisms designed so that he is not there. How in practice to organize these opposites and anticipate the solutions? This is the challenge taken up by this book. - Ce volume s'insère dans la ligne des ouvrages qui, dans cette collection en langue anglaise, sont consacrés à la Compliance. 📚Lire la présentation des autres ouvrages de la Collection portant sur la Compliance : les ouvrages suivants : 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), 📘Compliance Obligation, 2024  les ouvrages précédents : 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), 📘Compliance Monumental Goals, 2023 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), 📘Compliance Tools, 2021 - ► Résumé de l'ouvrage : There have always been Judges and Lawyers in Compliance Law, in particular because this branch of Law is an extension of Regulatory Law in which they have a core place. This results from the fact that the decisions taken in respect of Compliance are contestable in Court, including Arbitration, those issued by the Company, such as those of States or Authorities, the Judge in turn becoming what Compliance Law is effective. The novelty lies more in the phenomenon of « jurisdictionalisation », that is to say that the trial model penetrates all Compliance Law, and not only the Ex Post part that it includes. Moreover, it seems that this jurisdictionalisation influences the non-legal dimension of Compliance. This movement has effects that must be measured and causes that must be understood. Advantages and disadvantages that must be balanced. If only to form an opinion vis-à-vis Companies that have become Prosecutors and Judges of themselves and others… : encourage this « Jurisdictionalisation of Compliance », fight it, perhaps influence it? In any case, understand it! - 🏗️Construction générale de l'ouvrage : The book opens with a double Introduction. The first, which is freely accessible, consists of a summary of the book, while the second, which is substantial, deals with the need to bring the Judge and the Lawyer into line if Compliance Law is to be the hallmark of States governed by the Rule of Law. The first Chapter is devoted to what is specific to Compliance Law: the transformation of companies into Prosecutors and Judges of themselves, and even of others.   The second Chapter examines the interference between General Procedural Law and Compliance techniques. The third Chapter measures the influence of the reasoning and requirements of Compliance Law in methods of dispute resolution where it has not, with a few exceptions, been present, but where it has a great future: arbitration.  Because trials and judgements are indissociable, because legal techniques and the Rule of Law must not be dissociated, and because Compliance techniques could paradoxically be the weapon used to dissociate them, because the power to judge and the procedures surrounding it must not be dissociated, because Compliance and the Rule of Law must therefore be conceived and practised together, the rise in power of one being a sign of the rise in power of the other, and not the price of the weakening of the Rule of Law, the fourth Chapter deals with the role of the Judge in Compliance. - ► Appréhender l'ouvrage à travers la table des matières ci-dessous et les résumés de chacun des articles :    DOUBLE INTRODUCTION 🕴️​M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝Main Aspects of the book Compliance Jurisdictionalisation 🕴️​M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝Reinforce the Judge and the Lawyer to impose Compliance Law as a characteristic of the Rule of Law    I. THE COMPANY ESTABLISHED PROSECUTOR AND JUDGE OF ITSELF BY COMPLIANCE LAW 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝The « Judge-Judged ». Articulating Words and Things in the face of Conflicts of Interest 🕴️C. Granier, 📝Reflections on the existence of companies’ jurisprudence through Compliance matters 🕴️L.-M. Augagneur, 📝The jurisdictionalisation of reputation by platforms 🕴️A. Bruneau, 📝The compagny judges itself: the Compliance function in the bank 🕴️J.-M. Coulon, 📝Compliance law in the construction industry and the contradictions, impossibilities and deadlocks that companies face 🕴️Ch. Lapp, 📝Compliance in companies: the statues of process 🕴️J. Heymann, 📝The Legal Nature of the Facebook « Supreme Court » 🕴️D. Latour, 📝Internal investigations within companies 🕴️A. Bavitot, 📝Shaping the company through negotiated Criminal Justice Agreements. French perspective 🕴️S. Merabet, 📝Vigilance, being a judge and not judge   II. PROCEDURAL LAW IN COMPLIANCE LAW 🕴️​N. Cayrol, 📝Procedural Principles in Compliance Law 🕴️F. Ancel, 📝Compliance Law, a new guiding principle for the Trial? 🕴️B. Sillaman, 📝Taking the Compliance U.S. Procedural Experience globally 🕴️A. Linden, 📝Motivation and publicity of the decisions of the Restricted formation of the French Personal Data Protection Authority (Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés – CNIL) in a compliance perspective 🕴️S. Scemla, & 🕴️D. Paillot, 📝The difficulty for Compliance Enforcement Authorities to comprehend the Rights of the Defence in compliance matters 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝Adjusting General Procedural Law to Compliance Law by the nature of things   III. ARTICULATION BETWEEN COMPLIANCE LAW AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 🕴️J.-B. Racine, 📝Compliance and arbitration. An attempt at problematisation 🕴️E. Silva-Romero & 🕴️R. Legru, 📝What place is there for compliance in investment arbitration? 🕴️​M. Audit, 📝The arbitrator's position on compliance 🕴️E. Kleiman, 📝The objectives of compliance confronted with the actors of arbitration   IV. THE JUDGE IN COMPLIANCE LAW 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝The Judge, the Compliance Obligation and the Company. The Compliance Evidence System 🕴️J. Morel-Maroger, 📝The application of compliance standards by European Union judges  🕴️S. Schiller, 📝A single judge in the event of an international breach of compliance obligations? 🕴️O. Douvreleur, 📝Compliance and Judge of the Law 🕴️F. Raynaud, 📝The Administrative Judge and Compliance 🕴️E. Wennerström, 📝Some Reflections on Compliance and the European Court of Human Rights
Couverture – Compliance Monumental Goals

Direction de publication

🏗️ coédition et direction de collection : 📚Compliance & Regulation

📚Parution de : 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.),📘 Compliance Monumental Goals

► Référence complète : M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), Compliance Monumental Goals, coll. "Compliance & Regulations", Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Bruylant, 2023, 528 p. - ► Le livre en quelques mots : Seize Compliance by its normativity: its Monumental Goals. The notion of « monumental goals » of Compliance was proposed in 2016 by Marie-Anne Frison-Roche 1🕴️M.A. Frison-Roche, 📝Compliance Law, 2016.. It has become explicit in the texts and the resolution of cases, for example to fight against climate change, make human beings effectively equal, force to be extraterritorially vigilant about suppliers.  Compliance Monumental Goals are targeted ex ante by regulations, contracts, CSR, and international treaties. Creating an alliance between business and political authorities, aiming for a new form of sovereignty. The presence in litigation of these Monumental Goals of global dimension renews the responsibilities and the Judge office. Describing and conceiving these Monumental Goals makes it possible to anticipate Compliance Law, which is more powerful every day. - 📕Parallèlement, un ouvrage en français, Les Buts Monumentaux de la Compliance, est publié dans la collection coéditée par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Dalloz.  - 🧮Les deux ouvrages font suite à un cycle de colloques 2021 organisés par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et des Universités qui lui sont partenaires. - Ce volume s'insère dans la ligne de cette collection créée par Marie-Anne Frison-Roche pour développer le Droit de la Compliance : 📚Lire les autres ouvrages de la Collection portant sur la Compliance : 📘 Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.), Compliance Juridictionnalisation, 2023 📘 Frison-Roche, M.-A. (ed.), Compliance Tools, 2020 - ► Construction générale de l'ouvrage : The book opens with an Introduction, ​which proposes the Monumental Goals as definition of Compliance Law putting them at its « beating heart », giving this new branch of law its originality and specificity, explaining what, in the History of the United States and Europe, gave birth to this singular corpus and justifies a substantial definition of Compliance Law. The concept of Monumental Goals is explained, justifying both systemic and political nature of Compliance Law, the practical consequences of which legal specific rules are thus better identified and limited, since Compliance Law does not lead to all-obedience. We can then determine what we can expect from this Law of the Future that is Compliance Law. From there, the book unfolds in 5 chapters. A first chapter is devoted to the « radioscopy » of this notion, and branch of Law by branch of Law. A second chapter aims to measure how the Monumental Goals are questioned by a crisis, for example in a health situation, but not in that example, if they aggravate it and must be discarded, or if, on the contrary, they are exactly conceived for this hypothesis. of crisis, risks, catastrophes and that it is advisable to exploit them, in particular in order, in this « test », to benefit from the alliance between the political authorities, public powers and crucial operators. Once made explicit and tested, the Monumental Goals must find a sure way to be considered. This is why a third chapter aims to measure in principle and in practice how the Proportionality method can help the integration of Compliance, thus giving a new dimension to the Law without dragging it into insecurity and illegitimate grabbing of powers. But because Compliance Monumental Goals express a very great ambition, the question of a bearable, even beneficial relationship with the international competitiveness of companies, standards and systems must be opened. This is the object of the fourth chapter.   Finally, because the Monumental Goals express by nature a new ambition of the Law in a world which must not give up in what could be the prospect of its abyss, the fifth chapter has for object the relationship between the Monumental Goals of Compliance and Sovereignty. - ► Table des matières :  INTRODUCTION 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝Main Aspects of the Book. The Monumental Goals of Compliance Law 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝Compliance Monumental Goals, Beating Heart of Compliance Law   CHAPTER I. THE VERY IDEA OF MONUMENTAL GOALS, THE BEATING HEART OF COMPLIANCE LAW 🕴️R.-O. Maistre, 📝What are the Monumental Goals for the Regulator in a Rapidly Changing Audiovisual and Digital Landscape? 🕴️A.-V. Le Fur, 📝Interest and “raison d’être” of the Company: How Does It Fit Together with the Compliance Monumental Goals? 🕴️A. Le Goff, 📝Monumental Goals Perceived by the Firm: Serene Business or Business under Pressure? 🕴️J.-F. Vaquieri, 📝The “Monumental Goals of Compliance” from the Company’s Perspective – the Case of Enedis 🕴️M. Malaurie-Vignal, 📝Monumental Goals of Market Law – Reflection on the Method 🕴️C. Peicuti et 🕴️J. Beyssade,📝Feminisation of Positions of Responsibility in the Workplace as a Goal of Compliance. Example of the Banking Sector 🕴️I. Gavanon, 📝Data Protection Law in the Digital Economy Confronted to Monumental Goals 🕴️B. Petit, 📝The Monumental Goals of (European) Labour Law: a Changing System with Balances to be Consolidated 🕴️G. Beaussonie, 📝Do Criminal Law and Compliance Form a System? 🕴️Ch. Huglo,📝Under what Conditions could Climate Law Constitute a Priority Monumental Goal?   CHAPTER II. IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPLIANCE MONUMENTAL GOALS IN ARTICULATION WITH THE MAJOR PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY 🕴️L. Rapp, 📝Compliance, Proportionality and Normativity 🕴️B. Bär-Bouyssière, 📝Proportionality and Compliance 🕴️A. Mendoza-Caminade, 📝Proportionality and Evaluation. The Example of Intellectual Property Law 🕴️L. Meziani, 📝Proportionality in Compliance, the Guarantee of Public Order in Companies 🕴️M. Segonds, 📝Compliance, Proportionality and Sanction. A French Perspective 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝Definition of Proportionality and Definition of Compliance Law   CHAPTER III. COMPLIANCE MONUMENTAL GOALS TESTED BY CRISIS SITUATIONS 🕴️A. Oumedjkane, A. Tehrani et P. Idoux, 📝Public Norms and Compliance in Crisis Periods: Testing Monumental Goals. A Few Thoughts 🕴️J. Bonnet, 📝The Crisis, an Opportunity to Seize Compliance as a Mode of Communication for Public Authorities 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝Place and Role of Companies in the Creation and Effectiveness of Compliance Law in Crisis   CHAPTER IV. EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPLIANCE MONUMENTAL GOALS AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 🕴️B. Deffains, 📝Compliance and International Competitiveness 🕴️J.-Ch. Roda, 📝Compliance, Internal Investigations and International Competitiveness: What are Risks for the French Companies (in the Light of Antitrust Law)? 🕴️F. Marty, 📝The Case for Compliance Programs in International Competitiveness: A Competition Law and Economics Perspective 🕴️S. Lochmann, 📝ESG Rating Agencies and Compliance as an Effective Way of Increasing International Competitiveness 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝Assessment of Whistleblowing and Vigilance Obligation with regard to International Competitiveness   CHAPTER V. COMPLIANCE SUPPORTED BY MONUMENTAL GOALS, A NEW WAY FOR SOVEREIGNTY 🕴️R. Bismuth, 📝The Ambiguous Relations between Corporate Compliance and Sovereignty 🕴️L. Benzoni, 📝International Trade, Competitivity and Sovereignty: Towards a Political Economy of Compliance 🕴️S. Pottier, 📝In Favour of European Compliance, a Vehicle of Economic and Political Assertion 🕴️Ch. André, 📝State Sovereingty, Sovereingty of the People: What Social Contract for Compliance? 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche, 📝The Principle of Active Systemic Proximity: Corollary of the Renewal of the Principle of Sovereignty by Compliance Law
Couverture – Compliance Tools

Direction de publication

🏗️ coédition et direction de collection : 📚Compliance & Regulation

📚Parution de : 📘Compliance Tools

► Référence complète : M.-A. Frison-Roche (dir.), Compliance Tools, Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Bruylant, coll "Régulations & Compliance", 2021, 357 p. - 📕Parallèlement, un ouvrage en français, Les outils de la Compliance, est publié dans la collection "Régulations & Compliance", co-éditée par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et Dalloz   - 🧮Cet ouvrage vient à la suite d'un cycle de colloques organisés par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) et des Universités qui lui sont partenaires   - Cet ouvrage en langue anglaise constitue le 1ier titre de cette collection entièrement consacrée au Droit de la Compliance, en ce que celui-ci est le prolongement du Droit de la Régulation.  📚Lire la présentation des autres ouvrages de la Collection portant sur la Compliance : 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), Compliance Obligation, 2024   🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), Compliance Jurisdictionalisation, 2023 🕴️M.-A. Frison-Roche (ed.), Compliance Monumental Goals, 2023 📚Consulter les autres titres de la collection 📚Cette collection en langue anglaise s'articule avec une collection coéditée entre le Journal of Regulation & Compliance et Dalloz - ► Présentation générale de l'ouvrage : The political dimension of Compliance Law lies in the goals it aims to achieve. To achieve them, the concern for these goals is internalized in « crucial operators », which may be obliged to concretize « monumental goals » set by public authorities. These public bodies control the Ex Ante reorganization that this implies for these companies and sanction Ex Post the possible inadequacy of the companies, which have become transparent to this end. The effectiveness and efficiency of this internalization, without which the statement of these goals is worth nothing, is based on the Compliance tools that are deployed. These appear to be truly diverse but their substantial unity (topic which will be the subject of a forthcoming book) makes it possible to study the tools put in place from a unique perspective, by not isolating them in a particular branch of Law, Criminal law or International Law for example, but by measuring what is common to them, notably Anticipation, Trust, Commitment, Responsibility, Incentive, and so on. If the Compliance tools vary, it is not only according to the sectors, finance and banking appearing then as the advanced point of the general Compliance Law, for example in environmental matters, but also according to the countries and the cultures. It is in fact about them that legal cultures seem to oppose. The book aims to understand these « tools » by going beyond the description of each instrument, for which we already have many monographs, for analyzing them through the issues of Risks, required Expertises, Training. Sovereignty claims, Incentives, mechanical aptitude of Technologies. It is through these themes that are analyzed by the authors, experts in the field, what we always want to understand better: Compliance Programs, Whistleblowing, Mapping, Sanctions, Extraterritoriality, etc.   - 📘Consulter le sommaire de l'ouvrage.  - ► Appréhender l'ouvrage à travers la table des matières ci-dessous et les résumés de chacun des articles :    INTRODUCTION 📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Describing, designing and correlating Compliance Tools to Have a Better Use of It   I. LEGAL AND ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO COMPLIANCE TOOLS 📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Building by Law the Unicity of Compliance Tools from the Definition of Compliance Law by its « Monumental Goals » 🕴️L. Benzoni et B. Deffains, 📝An Economic Approach to Compliance Tools: Finality, Measure, and Effectivity of Constrained or Chosen Compliance   II. RISK MAPPING, CENTRAL COMPLIANCE TOOL   III. PLACE AND USE OF INCENTIVES IN COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS   IV. THE REQUIRED EXPERTISES IN TERMS OF COMPLIANCE   V. THE GEOGRAPHICAL DOMINANCE OF COMPLIANCE TOOLS   VI. THE MEASURE OF COMPLIANCE TOOLS EFFECTIVITY   VII. TRAINING, ALPHA AND OMEGA OF COMPLIANCE   VIII. TECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS AND COMPLIANCE BY DESIGN   CONCLUSION 📝Amico, Th., Compliance or the passage from ex post to ex ante: A Copernican revolution for the criminal lawyer? 📝Banck, A., The maturity of the Compliance tool’s user, first criterion of the choice of the salient tool 📝Burlingame, R., Coppens, K., Power, N., Lee, D.H., Anti-Corruption Compliance: Global Dimension of Enforcement and Risk Management 📝Calandri, L., Incentive(s) and Self-Regulation(s): which place for Compliance Law in the Audiovisual Sector?  📝Causse, H., Compliance Training: Through and Beyond Traditional Legal Training 📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Drawing up Risk Maps as an obligation and the paradox of the « Compliance risks »  📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Incentives and Compliance, a couple to propel 📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Resolving the contradiction between sanctions and incentives under the fire of Compliance Law 📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Rights, primary and natural Compliance Tools 📝Frison-Roche, M.-A., Training: content and container of Compliance Law​ 📝Galland, M., The Regulator's Inspection of the Effectiveness of the Compliance Tools Implemented by the Company 📝Granier, C., The Normative Originality of Compliance by Design 📝Guillaume, N., Compliance risk mapping: first insights of challenges, limits and good practices 📝Guttierez-Crespin, A., Audit of Compliance Systems 📝Koenigsberg, S. and Barrière, F., The Development of Attorney's Compliance Expertise 📝Larouer, M., The Manifestation of Incentives Mechanisms in French Compliance Law 📝Merabet, S., Morality by Design 📝Pailler, L., Technological Tools, Compliance by Design and GDPR: the Protection of Personal Data from Design 📝Racine, J.-B., Geographical dominance in the choice and the use of Compliance Tools. Introductory remarks​ 📝Rapp, L., Incentive Theory and Governance of Space Activities 📝Roda, J.-C., Compliance by design in antitrust: between innovation and illusion 📝Salah, M., Conception and Application of Compliance in Africa 📝Tardieu, H., Data Sovereignty and Compliance 📝Thouret, T., Training and Compliance, Two Correlated Information Transmission Tools   -